Tag: NHL

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published: October 7, 2026, 18:48 CEST

Story Summary

The Detroit Red Wings are reportedly continuing discussions with restricted free-agent defenceman Simon Edvinsson’s representative, J.P. Barry, but Darren Dreger has indicated that no progress has been made.

Edvinsson is viewed within the organisation as a potential foundational player, yet Detroit are said to be listening to other clubs while comparing possible trade interest with the cost of keeping him.

Larkin’s trade request after last season has been confirmed, but no completed transaction has been announced. The immediate reporting concerns Detroit’s evaluation of its options rather than an agreed deal for Larkin or Edvinsson.

Key Facts

• Darren Dreger reported that the Red Wings and Simon Edvinsson’s agent, J.P. Barry, remain in contact but have made no progress on a new agreement.
• Edvinsson is a restricted free agent and is regarded as a possible foundational piece for Detroit.
• Detroit are reportedly listening to other teams’ views on Edvinsson while weighing that interest against the cost of moving him.
• Dylan Larkin’s situation was described as fluid and extending into the early part of the season.
• Larkin requested a trade after last season, though he reported to Red Wings training camp.
• Kris Draper has moved into Detroit’s pro scouting department and is the club’s director of pro scouting.
• Shawn Horcoff is identified as Detroit’s interim general manager.
• There is no report of an agreed trade involving either Larkin or Edvinsson.

IHM Discussion

This is not simply a contract file. Edvinsson’s negotiation is being discussed against a wider question of how Detroit wishes to build its next version of the roster.

The central confirmed fact is that the club continues to speak with Barry. The central reported complication is the absence of progress. That does not establish that a trade is imminent, or even that one will happen. It does, however, leave Detroit with two paths that need careful separation: finding terms that keep Edvinsson in the organisation, or determining whether any outside offer is compelling enough to alter that plan.

Larkin’s position adds weight to the discussion without making the two cases identical. His requested trade is a separate roster issue, while the reporting around Edvinsson concerns an unsigned restricted free agent whom Detroit want to retain. Treating both players as automatically available would go beyond what has been reported. The more accurate reading is that Detroit are managing uncertainty around two important players at once.

Draper’s pro-scouting role is relevant because it gives the club a defined mechanism for assessing professional players who could feature in any future trade conversation. That is preparation, not proof that an exchange is close. Horcoff’s task is to establish what alternatives exist while continuing to judge the value of keeping players already central to the club’s plans.

Why It Matters

Edvinsson’s case matters because Detroit reportedly see him as a player around whom the organisation can build. A prolonged lack of movement therefore carries more significance than an ordinary depth-contract negotiation: it creates uncertainty around a player the club would prefer to keep.

Larkin’s requested trade compounds that uncertainty. If Detroit were to make major decisions on both players, it would reshape the discussion around the club’s immediate personnel base. But the present information does not support declaring that outcome likely. The important hockey issue is the breadth of the evaluation now taking place, not a prediction about where either player will play.

For Detroit, keeping the distinction between leverage and intent will be crucial. Listening to interest can be part of responsible roster management. Keeping Edvinsson remains the stated preference., while Larkin’s unresolved circumstances remain a separate matter that has yet to produce a completed move.

IHM Market Outlook

The reported market position is clear but limited: Detroit are said to be hearing from teams on Edvinsson while remaining in negotiations with Barry. That creates information for the Red Wings, but it does not establish an asking price, a specific suitor, a trade package or a deadline for a decision.

Larkin’s circumstances make Detroit’s broader market work more consequential. The club can use pro scouting to identify players who fit possible scenarios, yet there is no basis to say that any particular player has been targeted or that negotiations have advanced. Until a contract agreement or transaction is announced, both situations should be treated as unresolved.

Mini Q&A

Have the Red Wings traded Simon Edvinsson?

No. Detroit are reportedly listening to other clubs, but no trade has been agreed or announced.

What is the latest reported position in Edvinsson’s contract talks?

Detroit and J.P. Barry are reportedly still talking, but no progress has been reported.

Is Dylan Larkin confirmed to be leaving Detroit?

No. Larkin requested a trade after last season, but no completed transaction has been announced.

Why is Kris Draper’s role relevant?

As Detroit’s director of pro scouting, Draper is positioned to assess professional players who could be relevant if trade scenarios emerge.

Coach Mark Comment

Detroit’s immediate challenge is organisational clarity rather than a tactical adjustment. If Edvinsson is regarded as a foundational player, the club must be precise about whether the negotiation remains its preferred route or whether the return available elsewhere would genuinely support its longer-term structure. Larkin’s separate trade request makes that clarity more important, because simultaneous uncertainty around two major players can complicate every roster conversation.

IHM Final View

The Red Wings reportedly want to re-sign Simon Edvinsson despite the lack of progress, while Dylan Larkin’s previously confirmed trade request remains unresolved.

There is no completed deal to report for either player. The responsible conclusion is that Detroit are still gathering options, continuing discussions and assessing how much change the organisation is willing to contemplate.

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published: October 6, 2026, 19:35 CEST

Story Summary

The Detroit Red Wings have reportedly raised their contract offer to restricted free-agent defenceman Simon Edvinsson, but the proposed terms have not been enough to bring an agreement into reach.

Detroit are said to have offered Edvinsson a six-year deal worth around $8.5 million per season, broadly in the range of Moritz Seider’s $8.55 million figure. The reported proposal represents movement from the club’s earlier preference for a bridge arrangement, yet it has not resolved a dispute that has left Edvinsson frustrated and away from the team while he is back in Sweden.

The central issue is not whether Detroit value the 23-year-old. The club’s messaging has continued to indicate that addition Edvinsson remains its preferred outcome. The reported difficulty is the price of the longer commitment. If the parties are discussing six or seven years, the player’s side is reportedly seeking a figure much closer to $11 million annually than Detroit’s current range.

That leaves a significant distance between the two positions. A trade has been discussed as a possibility, with Seattle and Philadelphia among the clubs said to have shown interest, but Detroit are reportedly not keen to explore that route at present. For now, the negotiation remains open, even if the relationship has clearly been tested.

Key Facts

• Simon Edvinsson remains without a new contract with the Detroit Red Wings.
• Detroit have reportedly offered Edvinsson a six-year contract worth around $8.5 million per season.
• The reported offer is in the range of Moritz Seider’s $8.55 million annual figure.
• Detroit’s move to six years reportedly marked a shift from an initial preference for a bridge deal.
• Edvinsson is reportedly seeking substantially more money on a six- or seven-year agreement, with discussion around a figure near $11 million annually.
• Edvinsson has returned to Sweden amid the unresolved negotiations and is reportedly frustrated by how the situation has unfolded.
• Detroit are still said to prefer addition Edvinsson rather than pursuing a trade.
• Seattle and Philadelphia are among the teams reportedly monitoring the situation, though no trade talks or package have been confirmed.

IHM Discussion

This is now a negotiation defined by term as much as salary. Detroit’s reported six-year proposal is meaningful because it shows willingness to provide cost certainty rather than insisting on a short bridge. But term alone does not close a deal when the annual valuation remains far apart.

For Edvinsson, a long agreement would cover years in which he expects to carry major responsibility on Detroit’s blue line. The reported comparison with Seider is therefore understandable from the club’s side, but it does not automatically settle the player’s own valuation. A comparable contract can frame a conversation; it cannot end it when each negotiation has its own timing, leverage and appetite for risk.

The immediate language around a trade should also be handled carefully. Interest from other teams is not a completed market, and there is no confirmed indication that Detroit have invited bids or negotiated a return. That keeps the focus on whether the parties can find a number and structure both can accept, rather than treating a departure as inevitable.

The tension is nevertheless real. Edvinsson stayed around the club during camp in the expectation that an agreement could be reached. With no deal completed and the season under way, the absence is no longer merely an off-season administrative issue. It has become a live roster problem and a test of how quickly both sides can reset the discussion.

Why It Matters

Edvinsson is not a peripheral restricted free agent. He is a young left-shot defenceman whom Detroit regard as an important part of their group, and the organisation have publicly treated his contract as a priority.

His absence removes a sizeable option from the blue line while the club work through the opening stage of the season. It also complicates the wider roster picture because an eventual agreement will establish a major long-term financial commitment. Detroit must weigh the value of securing a key defender for multiple years against the cost of moving materially beyond their reported offer.

For Edvinsson, the decision is similarly consequential. A six- or seven-year deal would provide security, but would also set the terms of his value through a substantial portion of his prime. The reported difference between roughly $8.5 million and a figure nearer $11 million is not a small final detail; it is the core of the disagreement.

IHM Market Outlook

The reported market signal is clear: other clubs are paying attention, but Detroit have not publicly shifted from their preference to retain Edvinsson. Seattle and Philadelphia being linked to the situation should therefore be viewed as monitoring interest rather than evidence of an active bidding process.

Detroit’s six-year proposal may have narrowed the structural divide by moving away from a bridge preference. The financial divide, however, remains substantial on the reported figures. Until either side changes its position, the key market development is not outside interest but whether Detroit and Edvinsson can reopen the conversation on a long-term valuation.

No trade destination, trade package or timetable has been confirmed. The responsible reading of the situation is that a deal remains possible, while a move elsewhere remains only a reported contingency.

Mini Q&A

What have the Red Wings reportedly offered Simon Edvinsson?

Detroit have reportedly offered a six-year contract worth around $8.5 million per season.

Is Simon Edvinsson expected to be traded?

No trade has been confirmed. Detroit are reportedly still prioritising a new contract, although Seattle, Philadelphia and other clubs are said to be monitoring the situation.

Why has the negotiation stalled?

The reported gap is primarily financial: Detroit’s proposed annual value is around $8.5 million, while discussion around a six- or seven-year deal has placed Edvinsson’s desired figure much closer to $11 million.

Coach Mark Comment

The hockey issue is the lost continuity rather than a tactical mystery. A young defenceman’s value grows quickly when he is trusted with regular minutes and difficult situations, and a prolonged absence interrupts the work of building stable pairings and shared defensive habits. Detroit’s preference to sign Simon Edvinsson makes sense because keeping an important defenceman in the programme is more straightforward than trying to replace that role during the season.

IHM Final View

Detroit have reportedly made a serious move by putting a six-year offer in the $8.5 million range on the table, but the available information suggests it has not reached Edvinsson’s valuation. The next meaningful development will be an actual agreement or a confirmed change in Detroit’s willingness to consider a trade. Until then, this remains an unresolved contract dispute, not a completed departure.