Tag: Detroit Red Wings

What the next Detroit GM must do: Edvinsson, Larkin, DeBrincat

Story Summary

Steve Yzerman ” stepped down” as general manager of the Detroit Red Wings on July 15, with no successor identified six weeks later. An opinion column sets out three proposed priorities for the next GM: extend unsigned restricted free-agent defenceman Simon Edvinsson, and explore trades involving captain Dylan Larkin and pending unrestricted free agent Alex DeBrincat. The case centres on cap space, contract status and the club’s direction.

Key Facts

  • Steve Yzerman ” stepped down” as general manager of the Detroit Red Wings on July 15.
  • Six weeks after Yzerman’s departure, the organisation still had no clarity on his successor.
  • Simon Edvinsson is an unsigned restricted free agent and one of six RFAs still unsigned as of the article.
  • Edvinsson’s agent told Swedish media in mid-August there had not been much negotiation in the absence of a GM.
  • The Red Wings reportedly have nearly $19.6 million in salary cap space.
  • Edvinsson’s camp is said to value him in the $7.5-8 million range, with preference for a near-maximum term.
  • A deal in that range would place Edvinsson marginally below Moritz Seider on the roster pay scale.
  • Dylan Larkin has publicly requested a trade because he believes the team is unlikely to win soon.
  • Larkin’s trade request was reportedly on hold while the Red Wings search for a new GM.
  • Alex DeBrincat is a pending unrestricted free agent and has 107 goals over the past three seasons.
  • DeBrincat can veto trades to roughly half the league, limiting Detroit’s control over his destination.
  • Reportedly, DeBrincat and Larkin are among the more movable assets on the roster compared with some longer, more restrictive contracts constructed under Yzerman.

IHM Discussion

The proposed sequence is to secure a controllable young defenceman before considering major roster changes. Edvinsson remains unsigned, and his agent said in mid-August that negotiations had been limited during the GM vacancy. Detroit reportedly has nearly $19.6 million in cap space. If his camp’s reported $7.5-8 million valuation is accurate, a near-maximum-term agreement would place him just below Moritz Seider on the defensive pay scale.

The suggested trades involving Larkin and DeBrincat are more contentious. It also argues that DeBrincat’s pending UFA status, recent scoring record of 107 goals in three seasons and partial trade protection make him an asset worth discussing with other clubs.

Those are recommendations, not reported decisions. A new GM could take a different view of the roster, but Edvinsson’s unresolved contract would be an immediate file to address.

Why It Matters

The decisions facing Detroit’s next GM would shape both the roster and its longer-term direction. An Edvinsson extension would settle the status of a young restricted free-agent defenceman, while trades involving Larkin or DeBrincat would represent a significant change in the club’s leadership and scoring group. The column advocates a reset, but the eventual approach will depend on the incoming GM’s assessment of the roster.

Mini Q&A

Who vacated the Red Wings GM role and when?

Steve Yzerman ” stepped down” as general manager on July 15.

What is the first task the new GM should undertake?

The article urges the new GM to extend restricted free agent Simon Edvinsson, who remained unsigned as of mid-August.

Why is Edvinsson considered a priority?

Edvinsson is a young, controllable defender; his agent said negotiations were limited during the GM vacancy and the Red Wings reportedly have nearly $19.6 million of cap space to facilitate a deal in the $7.5-8 million range.

What is Alex DeBrincat’s contract status and why trade him?

DeBrincat is a pending unrestricted free agent with 107 goals over the last three seasons; he can veto trades to roughly half the league, so Detroit could treat him as a valuable rental or find a landing spot acceptable to him.

Is there a suggested timing for these moves?

Reportedly, the new GM should address these files promptly and points to the holiday roster freeze as a useful checkpoint for a DeBrincat decision.

Coach Mark Comment

Edvinsson is the clearest immediate priority because his contract status is unresolved. Any wider roster decisions should follow a clear evaluation of who can carry meaningful minutes and responsibility as the group changes. Moving established forwards may create opportunities for younger players, but those opportunities only matter if the replacements are ready for the roles.

IHM Final View

The proposed agenda is clear: resolve Edvinsson’s contract, then weigh major decisions on Larkin and DeBrincat. The first is an immediate contract matter; the latter two are bold roster recommendations rather than settled outcomes. How the next GM balances those files will quickly define Detroit’s direction.

Trey Augustine set to compete for Grand Rapids starting job

Story Summary

Trey Augustine, Detroit’s 2023 second-round pick and one of the organisation’s leading goaltending prospects, will compete for the starting job with the Grand Rapids Griffins this fall. Augustine impressed across three seasons at Michigan State and had a two-game professional audition last season; he will compete with Michal Postava and Carter Gylander in Grand Rapids. Detroit’s June trade of prospect Sebastian Cossa provides further context for Augustine’s place in the Red Wings’ goaltending pipeline.

Key Facts

  • Trey Augustine was selected by the Detroit Red Wings in the second round (No. 41) of the 2023 NHL Draft.
  • Augustine is 21 and was described as one of the Red Wings’ leading goaltending prospects.
  • He will be vying for the starting goaltender job with the Grand Rapids Griffins, Detroit’s American Hockey League affiliate, this season.
  • Grand Rapids will have three goalies competing for the role: Trey Augustine, Michal Postava and Carter Gylander.
  • Augustine played two games with Grand Rapids last season and posted an 0-2-0 record with a 3.39 goals-against average and an.878 save percentage during that AHL stint.
  • In three seasons at Michigan State (2023-26), Augustine was named the Big Ten’s best goalie in the past two seasons.
  • Last season at Michigan State Augustine went 24-9-1 with a 2.11 GAA, a .929 save percentage and three shutouts in 34 games.
  • In 2024-25 Augustine was 19-7-4 with a 2.08 GAA, a .924 save percentage and three shutouts in 30 games.
  • Detroit traded goaltending prospect Sebastian Cossa to the Utah Mammoth on June 26 for a first-round pick in the 2026 NHL Draft.
  • Former Red Wings general manager Steve Yzerman said, “We wouldn’t have traded Sebastian had we not been comfortable with the depth that we have in goal.”
  • Grand Rapids coach Dan Watson praised Augustine’s competitiveness, work ethic and attention to detail, saying he ” does not like to get scored on” and noting Augustine stayed out extra in practice to take more shots.
  • Michigan State coach Adam Nightingale credited Augustine with helping turn around a program that had previously lost 16 straight, and called his ‘hockey brain’ elite and his lateral mobility very good.

IHM Discussion

Augustine arrives at a significant transition point. His college record at Michigan State is strong: consecutive Big Ten honours, goals-against averages below 2.12 and save percentages above.920 point to sustained success at the collegiate level. The small AHL sample from last spring – two games with Grand Rapids, a 3.39 GAA and an.878 save percentage – is too limited to draw firm conclusions about his professional readiness, but it allowed him to become familiar with the rink, city and professional routine.

Detroit’s roster moves provide context. The trade of Sebastian Cossa for a 2026 first-round pick came with Steve Yzerman’s assurance that the organisation was comfortable with its depth in goal. Augustine nevertheless still has to establish himself over a full professional season.

At Grand Rapids, the immediate picture is competitive. Dan Watson’s praise highlights Augustine’s temperament, work ethic and attention to detail – traits that matter as a young goaltender adjusts to greater speed and more experienced opponents. Augustine’s comments about preparation and readiness suggest a grounded approach to the opportunity.

Why It Matters

How Augustine performs with Grand Rapids will help shape Detroit’s goaltending depth chart and future decisions. If he earns the AHL starter’s role and produces consistently, he will strengthen the organisation’s internal options. For Augustine, establishing himself as a reliable AHL starter would create a stronger case for future NHL opportunities.

The move from college to professional hockey brings a faster game and more experienced opponents. Augustine’s first full AHL season will show how quickly his collegiate strengths carry over.

Mini Q&A

Who is Trey Augustine?

Trey Augustine is a 21-year-old goaltender selected by the Detroit Red Wings in the second round (No. 41) of the 2023 NHL Draft. He is one of the organisation’s leading goaltending prospects.

Where will Augustine play this season?

He will be competing for the starting goaltender job with the Grand Rapids Griffins, Detroit’s American Hockey League affiliate.

Who will Augustine compete with for the Grand Rapids job?

Augustine will battle Michal Postava and Carter Gylander for a spot in the Griffins’ netminder rotation.

How did Augustine perform at Michigan State?

Across three seasons at Michigan State, Augustine earned consecutive recognitions as the Big Ten’s best goalie and last season posted a 24-9-1 record with a 2.11 GAA, a .929 save percentage and three shutouts in 34 games.

Has Augustine played professional games before?

Yes. He appeared in two AHL games with Grand Rapids last season, going 0-2-0 with a 3.39 GAA and an.878 save percentage.

How does Detroit view its goaltending depth?

Detroit traded prospect Sebastian Cossa on June 26 for a 2026 first-round pick. Steve Yzerman said the club would not have made the trade if it were not comfortable with its depth in goal.

Coach Mark Comment

Augustine’s first full professional season will test how quickly his reading of the game and lateral mobility translate against faster attacks and more experienced shooters. The Grand Rapids competition should give Detroit a clear view of how he handles that step.

IHM Final View

Augustine has earned a substantive professional opportunity through his college record, his coaches’ praise and Detroit’s depth in goal. The AHL season will be an important measure of his adaptation. If he carries his competitiveness, work ethic and play-reading into Grand Rapids, he can strengthen his case for future NHL opportunities.

IHM NHL Rumors: Red Wings 2026-27 preview: Larkin trade request, Arvidsson

Red Wings 2026-27 preview: Larkin trade request, Arvidsson

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | August 21, 2026

Story Summary

The Detroit Red Wings enter 2026-27 trying to end a 10-year playoff drought after an off-season that brought both additions and significant uncertainty. Detroit signed Viktor Arvidsson to a two-year, $10 million contract, acquired Keegan Kolesar in a trade and added goaltender Daniil Tarasov.

At the same time, Patrick Kane departed in free agency, prospect Sebastian Cossa was traded and Simon Edvinsson remains an unsigned restricted free agent. The wider picture is complicated further by Dylan Larkin’s trade request and the organisation’s decision to move on from Steve Yzerman without yet naming a new general manager.

Key Facts

  • Detroit signed Viktor Arvidsson to a two-year, $10 million contract carrying a $5 million average annual value on July 1.
  • The Red Wings acquired Keegan Kolesar from Vegas on July 1 for a 2027 third-round pick.
  • Daniil Tarasov signed a two-year, $4 million contract with a $2 million average annual value on July 1.
  • Patrick Kane signed a two-year, $16 million contract with Chicago on July 23.
  • James van Riemsdyk departed in free agency, while Cam Talbot remains unsigned.
  • Detroit traded Sebastian Cossa to Utah for the 23rd overall pick in the 2026 NHL Draft.
  • Dylan Larkin has requested a trade and remains in limbo while Detroit has yet to appoint a new general manager to replace Steve Yzerman, who is switching roles.
  • Simon Edvinsson remains an RFA and still needs a contract for the 2026-27 season.
  • The preview lists a projected cap hit of $84,427,916, a 22-player roster, projected cap space of $19,572,084 and projected deadline cap space of $90,404,388.
  • Detroit’s core group includes Larkin, Lucas Raymond, Moritz Seider, Edvinsson, Alex DeBrincat, Marco Kasper, Nate Danielson, Michael Brandsegg-Nygard and Axel Sandin Pellikka.

IHM Discussion

Detroit’s off-season can be read as a series of targeted additions made against a backdrop of unresolved questions. Arvidsson is the clearest offensive addition. The 33-year-old scored 25 goals and 54 points in 69 games last season, and the preview projects him alongside Dylan Larkin and Lucas Raymond in a prominent scoring role.

That addition has to be considered alongside the loss of Patrick Kane. Kane’s departure removes a veteran playmaker who contributed both offence and power-play value. Detroit has added speed and scoring through Arvidsson, but the forward group has also lost one of its most experienced offensive creators.

Kolesar gives the Red Wings a more physical option deeper in the lineup, while Tarasov adds another goaltending option. Detroit also changed its long-term asset mix by moving Cossa for the 23rd overall pick in the 2026 draft.

The larger uncertainty sits beyond those individual transactions. Larkin has requested a trade, Edvinsson remains unsigned and the organisation has not yet named a new general manager. Those issues leave important parts of Detroit’s roster and leadership picture unresolved heading toward the new season.

Why It Matters

Detroit has spent years trying to move from rebuilding into consistent playoff contention, and the 2026-27 season arrives with that objective still unfinished. Arvidsson and Kolesar address specific roster needs, but the departure of Kane and the uncertainty surrounding Larkin prevent the off-season from being viewed as a straightforward upgrade.

The unresolved general manager position adds another layer. Decisions involving an unsigned RFA, a captain who has requested a trade and any further roster changes would normally sit at the centre of a club’s hockey operations planning. Until those questions are settled, Detroit’s final roster picture remains incomplete.

Market Outlook

The preview lists Detroit with $19,572,084 in projected cap space and a 22-player roster. That gives the organisation financial flexibility on paper, although those figures alone do not indicate what moves the club will make next.

The more immediate market issues are identifiable: Edvinsson still requires a contract, Larkin’s situation remains unresolved and Detroit has yet to appoint its next general manager. Those developments will matter more than the headline cap figure in determining how the roster looks when the season begins.

Mini Q&A

Who did Detroit add during the off-season?

The Red Wings signed Viktor Arvidsson and Daniil Tarasov and acquired Keegan Kolesar from Vegas. Arvidsson is the most significant offensive addition after scoring 25 goals and 54 points last season.

What is happening with Dylan Larkin?

Larkin has requested a trade and remains in limbo while the Red Wings continue without a newly appointed general manager following Steve Yzerman’s change of role.

How significant is Patrick Kane’s departure?

Kane signed a two-year, $16 million contract with Chicago on July 23. He recorded 16 goals and 36 assists in 70 games last season, and his departure removes an experienced offensive and power-play contributor from Detroit’s lineup.

What is Simon Edvinsson’s contract situation?

Edvinsson remains a restricted free agent and still needs a contract for the 2026-27 season.

How much cap space does Detroit have?

The preview lists a projected cap hit of $84,427,916 and projected cap space of $19,572,084 with 22 of 23 roster spots filled. It also lists projected deadline cap space of $90,404,388.

Coach Mark Comment

Detroit has added useful pieces, but continuity is difficult to evaluate while major personnel questions remain unresolved. Arvidsson gives the club another established scoring winger, Kolesar brings a different physical element and Tarasov adds depth in goal.

The bigger issue is certainty. A team preparing to push for the playoffs benefits from knowing the shape of its core, and Detroit currently has unanswered questions involving its captain, an important young defenceman and the general manager position. Resolving those issues would give the coaching staff a much clearer picture of the group it will take into the season.

What Comes Next

Simon Edvinsson still needs a contract for the 2026-27 season, Dylan Larkin’s trade request remains unresolved and Detroit has yet to appoint a new general manager. Those are the clearest developments to watch as the Red Wings move closer to the start of the season.

IHM Final View

Detroit’s off-season contains genuine upgrades but no clean resolution to the club’s wider uncertainty. Arvidsson adds scoring, Kolesar adds depth and Tarasov strengthens the goaltending options, while Kane’s departure removes an established offensive presence. With Larkin’s future unresolved, Edvinsson unsigned and the general manager position still open, the most important part of Detroit’s 2026-27 roster story may still be ahead.

Seider stays focused as Red Wings face uncertainty

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | August 21, 2026

Seider Stays Focused as Red Wings Face Uncertainty

Story Summary

Moritz Seider said he will concentrate on his own game as the Detroit Red Wings navigate change after missing the playoffs for a 10th straight season. Speaking during the European Player Media Tour in Berlin, the 25-year-old defenceman embraced the pressure around Hockeytown and made continued improvement his priority after a career-high 60-point campaign.

Key Facts

  • Moritz Seider, 25, spoke on August 21, 2026, during the European Player Media Tour in Berlin.
  • Seider posted a career-high 60 points in 2025-26, with 10 goals and 50 assists, and led Detroit with a plus-15 rating.
  • He ranked third in the NHL in average ice time at 25:40 per game last season and has 240 points, including 39 goals and 201 assists, in 410 career games.
  • Detroit finished 2025-26 with a 41-31-10 record, missed the playoffs by seven points and went 3-8-2 over its final 13 games, when the team was outscored 54-38.
  • Seider referenced several uncertainties in Detroit, including Steve Yzerman’s departure, Patrick Kane signing with the Chicago Blackhawks on July 25 and captain Dylan Larkin remaining in limbo after requesting a trade in June.
  • Seider represented Germany at the 2026 Olympics, where the team finished sixth.

IHM Discussion

Seider framed the situation simply: focus on what he can control. “Sometimes it’s good to just be at home,” he said, adding that he wants to concentrate on his own development rather than roster or management outcomes.

That stance matters at a time of significant change around Detroit. With Steve Yzerman gone, Patrick Kane now in Chicago and Dylan Larkin’s future unresolved, established members of the Red Wings’ core carry added importance. Seider already holds a major role: last season he produced 60 points while averaging 25:40 per game, combining offensive output with one of the heaviest workloads in the league.

He also made his competitive ambition clear. “I want to establish myself as a guy that people are not happy to see on the ice,” Seider said, while describing shutting down top forwards as a personal benchmark. He acknowledged that he is not yet among the game’s elite defencemen but wants to enter that conversation, making continued development rather than off-ice uncertainty the focus of his message.

Why It Matters

Detroit’s short-term outlook is closely tied to how its core responds to front-office turnover and roster change. Seider is one of the club’s foundational players, has not missed a game since joining the Red Wings and handled one of the NHL’s largest average workloads last season. For a team that missed the postseason by seven points, maintaining that level while continuing to improve would be significant.

Mini Q&A

Is Seider worried about the departures and trade uncertainty in Detroit?

He acknowledged that they are significant topics but said they are matters for management. “All the other topics, they’re meant to be decided by management and I’m a player and don’t have to think about that too much,” he said, adding that he will “come and do my job.”

How did Seider describe his own goals?

He wants to keep improving and to be “in conversation with the best defencemen in the League.” He accepted that last season was his best to date but said there is still “plenty of room to work on.”

How significant was his 2025-26 season?

It was his best NHL season to date: 60 points, including 10 goals and 50 assists, with a team-leading plus-15 rating. He also ranked third in the NHL in average ice time at 25:40 per game.

How did Germany perform with Seider at the 2026 Olympics?

Seider represented Germany at the tournament, where the team finished sixth.

Coach Mark Comment

Seider’s workload already shows how important he is to Detroit. Averaging 25:40 per game while producing a career-high 60 points puts considerable responsibility on a 25-year-old defenceman. His own message is the right one for that position: concentrate on the parts of the game he can control, keep improving and avoid allowing organisational uncertainty to dictate his preparation.

For Detroit, consistency from a player carrying those minutes is particularly valuable during a period of change. Seider does not need to solve the club’s off-ice questions; his contribution is to maintain the level of play that has made him one of the team’s central pieces and continue pushing toward the standard he has set for himself.

What Comes Next

Seider’s focus now turns to the start of the 2026-27 season with Detroit. His stated priority remains personal improvement as the Red Wings try to respond to another missed postseason and the uncertainty surrounding the organisation.

IHM Final View

Seider’s approach is straightforward: control what he can and keep improving. For Detroit, that steady focus matters during an unsettled period. After a career-best season and another heavy workload, his next step is to build on that performance while the wider questions around the Red Wings are resolved away from the ice.

Seider stays focused amid Red Wings turmoil this off-season

Story Summary

Moritz Seider says he has deliberately kept his attention on the ice and his own preparation despite a turbulent off-season in Detroit that included Steve Yzerman stepping down as general manager, Patrick Kane leaving in free agency and captain Dylan Larkin requesting a trade.

Speaking to reporters on the European Player Media Tour on Friday, the Red Wings’ assistant captain said time away from Hockeytown has helped him avoid getting swept up in matters he sees as the responsibility of management. He added he is focused on improving the defensive side of his game as he chases a place among the league’s best defencemen.

Key Facts

  • Seider spoke to reporters during the European Player Media Tour on Friday and said he has used time away from Detroit to “focus on your stuff, focusing on what you can control.”
  • off-season context in Detroit: Steve Yzerman stepped down as general manager; Patrick Kane departed in free agency; Dylan Larkin requested a trade.
  • Last season Seider set career highs with 10 goals, 60 points, plus/minus of plus-15 and average ice time per game of 25:40.
  • Detroit went 3-8-2 in their final 13 games and missed the Stanley Cup Playoffs; it was the franchise’s 10th consecutive season out of the post-season.
  • Seider is the 2021-22 Calder Trophy winner, is 25 years old and is from Germany.
  • He earned down-ballot consideration in both the Hart and Norris Trophy voting last season and received five first-place votes in the Norris balloting.
  • Seider on management topics: “All the other topics, they’re meant to be decided by management and I’m a player and don’t have to think about that too much.”
  • On his personal goals: “I want to establish myself as a guy that people are not happy to see on the ice…to do everything I can to shut the best forwards down in every single game.”

IHM Discussion

The clearest takeaway from Seider’s comments is a simple one: he is narrowing his focus. That is a pragmatic play by a young player who already carries a heavy workload for his team and who finished last season with career-highs across offence and ice time.

Detroit’s off-ice turbulence is well known. Seider does not pretend to be the decision-maker for those questions. By repeatedly returning ownership of those issues to management, he keeps his public role defined as player and leader on the ice rather than a voice in front-office direction.

That is significant because Seider occupies a central on-ice role for the Red Wings. He averaged 25 minutes and 40 seconds a night last season and pushed the counting numbers offensively while earning recognition in individual award ballots. The combination of heavy minutes and a stated desire to tighten his defensive game suggests Seider sees his path to being considered among the very best defencemen as two-sided: maintain his offensive contributions while becoming a shutdown presence.

His phrase about wanting opponents to be “not happy to see you” neatly summarises a classic defensive benchmark. It is not a technical prescription – he did not outline specific tactical changes – but it does set a measurable intent. Opponents’ discomfort is a proxy for consistent, high-level defensive impact: winning key battles, neutralising top forwards and limiting high-danger chances. Those are the areas a defenceman of Seider’s usage must improve to lift a club that missed the playoffs for a 10th straight season.

Why It Matters

Seider is arguably Detroit’s single most-important young building block on the ice. If he can lift the defensive side of his play while keeping his offensive upside, the Red Wings gain a two-way difference-maker who can anchor the team in key starts and late-game situations. Conversely, if he remains primarily offensive with defensive gaps unaddressed, the club’s long playoff drought is unlikely to be solved by his scoring alone.

Fan Pulse

Fans will likely read Seider’s comments as reassurance that the team’s best young defenceman remains committed to performance, not headlines. His focus on controllables – training, minutes and defensive detail – is the kind of message supporters expect from a leader when the organisation is in flux.

Mini Q&A

What did Seider say about the off-ice turmoil?

He said spending time at home helped him “get away from everything a little bit” and that broader organisational topics are for management to decide: “I’m a player and don’t have to think about that too much.”

How did Seider perform last season?

He posted career highs with 10 goals, 60 points and a plus-15, and averaged 25:40 of ice time per game. He also received down-ballot Hart and Norris Trophy consideration, including five first-place Norris votes.

What part of his game does he want to improve?

Seider emphasised the defensive side. He said he wants to be “a guy that people are not happy to see on the ice” and aims to “shut the best forwards down in every single game.”

Does Seider address trade or management outcomes?

No. He deferred those topics to management and repeatedly framed them as matters outside his remit as a player.

Coach Mark Comment

From a coaching perspective, Seider’s remarks are the right soundtrack for a player in his position. He is young enough to still be developing, already trusted enough to log heavy minutes, and publicly committed enough to the team that he is not using the off-ice noise as an excuse or distraction. That combination matters more than rhetoric.

Practically speaking, a coach looking to get more defensive consistency from Seider would prioritise two broad areas that follow directly from what Seider said: role clarity and situational emphasis. Role clarity means being explicit about when Seider is expected to be a driving puck-mover and when he is being asked to lock down a top opponent. That does not require a wholesale tactical reinvention; it requires clear game plans for matchups, zone starts and late-game deployment so Seider’s decision-making maps to the coach’s intent.

Situational emphasis is the micro work. If Seider wants opponents to be “not happy to see you,” that translates into winning high-danger battles, lane discipline in the defensive zone, and consistent stick and gap management. These are the marginal details that reduce quality chances against and let a team eke out close wins, the sort Seider referenced when he said a 1-0 win still gets you two points.

Finally, psychological workload cannot be ignored. Heavy minutes and public leadership during organisational change can strain a player’s attention. Seider’s choice to focus on controllables should free up mental energy for practice and preparation. If coaches can preserve that focus with clear tasks and manageable expectations, Seider is positioned to make the kind of incremental defensive gains that lift an entire defensive group without sacrificing his offensive trait set.

What Comes Next

Training camp is less than a month away, and the Red Wings head into it with both questions for management and a clear on-ice priority from one of their top players. Seider has signalled he will concentrate on his preparation and defensive improvement; how the club pairs that with usage and support in camp will shape his role for the 2026-27 season.

IHM Final View

Seider’s public stance is straightforward and constructive: keep the spotlight on performance, not personnel. For a 25-year-old defenceman already logging elite minutes, that focus is the most useful response to external uncertainty. If he follows through on the defensive refinements he described, it will materially raise Detroit’s chances to turn a long post-season drought into a more competitive season.

2019 Re-Draft: Hughes Stays No.1; Caufield to Red Wings

2019 NHL Draft Re-Draft: How the Top 10 Looks Seven Years Later

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | August 20, 2026

Story Summary

Re-running the top 10 from the 2019 NHL Draft with the benefit of hindsight produces several major changes but leaves Jack Hughes at the head of the class.

Cole Caufield rises from his original No. 15 selection to Detroit at No. 6, Moritz Seider moves up to Chicago at No. 3, while Thomas Harley climbs into the top four. Bowen Byram remains a top-10 player but moves down from his original No. 4 selection to No. 8.

The exercise shows how proven NHL scoring, defensive impact and long-term development would have changed several franchise-defining decisions.

Key Facts

  • No. 1, New Jersey Devils: Jack Hughes, centre. Original pick: Jack Hughes.
  • No. 2, New York Rangers: Matt Boldy, left wing. Original pick: Kaapo Kakko.
  • No. 3, Chicago Blackhawks: Moritz Seider, defenceman. Original pick: Kirby Dach.
  • No. 4, Colorado Avalanche: Thomas Harley, defenceman. Original pick: Bowen Byram.
  • No. 5, Los Angeles Kings: Pavel Dorofeyev, left wing. Original pick: Alex Turcotte.
  • No. 6, Detroit Red Wings: Cole Caufield, right wing. Original Detroit pick: Moritz Seider. Caufield was actually selected No. 15 overall by Montreal in 2019, meaning this re-draft moves him nine positions higher.
  • No. 7, Buffalo Sabres: Jackson LaCombe, defenceman. Original pick: Dylan Cozens.
  • No. 8, Edmonton Oilers: Bowen Byram, defenceman. Original pick: Philip Broberg. Byram was originally selected No. 4 overall by Colorado and moves down to No. 8 in this exercise.
  • No. 9, Anaheim Ducks: Dylan Cozens, centre. Original pick: Trevor Zegras.
  • No. 10, Vancouver Canucks: Trevor Zegras, left wing. Original pick: Vasili Podkolzin.

IHM Discussion

The re-draft exercise shows how dramatically several years of NHL evidence can change the value attached to a draft class.

Jack Hughes remaining at No. 1 is the easiest decision. New Jersey still receives the franchise centre around whom the rest of the roster can be constructed.

Detroit taking Cole Caufield at No. 6 is one of the most significant changes. Caufield was originally selected 15th overall by Montreal, so hindsight moves him nine positions higher rather than lower.

His proven ability to score goals at NHL level changes the calculation that surrounded him on draft night. Concerns about his 5-foot-8 frame contributed to his original slide, but years of production have provided evidence that his finishing ability outweighs those concerns.

The defensive reshuffle is equally interesting.

Moritz Seider moves from Detroit’s original No. 6 position to Chicago at No. 3, giving the Blackhawks a high-minute No. 1 defenceman.

Thomas Harley climbs into the top four at No. 4.

Bowen Byram moves in the opposite direction. Colorado originally selected him fourth overall, while this exercise places him eighth with Edmonton. He remains a valuable top-10 player, but hindsight changes his position relative to several players who developed into larger NHL roles.

Matt Boldy and Pavel Dorofeyev are two other significant risers among the forwards. Their established NHL production gives the Rangers and Kings alternatives that would substantially change the construction of those franchises.

Why It Matters

A re-draft is not simply an exercise in ranking players. It demonstrates how one decision near the top of a draft can influence an organisation for years.

Keeping Hughes at No. 1 preserves New Jersey’s franchise-centre foundation.

Moving Seider to Chicago gives the Blackhawks a defensive cornerstone.

Detroit choosing Caufield instead of Seider would create an entirely different roster identity, exchanging a foundational defenceman for one of the strongest goal scorers produced by the class.

Caufield is also one of the clearest examples of how draft projection can differ from eventual NHL value. He does not fall to No. 6 in this exercise. He rises from No. 15 to No. 6.

The defensive movement tells a similar story. Harley rises into the top four, Seider rises to No. 3, while Byram remains highly regarded but moves from his original No. 4 position to No. 8.

Draft position measures projection on one day. A re-draft measures what happened after development, opportunity and NHL performance supplied years of additional evidence.

Mini Q&A

Who remains the No. 1 pick?

Jack Hughes stays with New Jersey at No. 1 and remains the franchise centre of the 2019 class.

Where does Cole Caufield land?

Cole Caufield moves to Detroit at No. 6.

He was originally selected No. 15 overall by Montreal, meaning he rises nine positions in this re-draft.

What is Chicago’s biggest gain?

Chicago selects Moritz Seider at No. 3, adding a high-minute defenceman capable of anchoring the blue line.

Which defencemen move the most?

Moritz Seider rises from No. 6 to No. 3, while Thomas Harley climbs into the top four.

Bowen Byram moves down from his original No. 4 selection to No. 8.

Which forwards make notable jumps?

Matt Boldy moves to the Rangers at No. 2, Pavel Dorofeyev climbs to No. 5 for Los Angeles and Cole Caufield makes one of the largest jumps by moving from his actual No. 15 selection to No. 6.

IHM Final View

The 2019 NHL Draft looks considerably different with seven years of hindsight.

Jack Hughes remains the cornerstone at No. 1, but much of the order behind him changes.

Moritz Seider rises into Chicago’s No. 3 position. Thomas Harley moves into the top four. Cole Caufield makes a major jump from his actual No. 15 selection to Detroit at No. 6.

Bowen Byram remains inside the top 10 but moves from the No. 4 position where Colorado originally selected him to No. 8.

The exercise does not rewrite history. It demonstrates why draft evaluation continues long after draft night: projection starts the process, but development and NHL production eventually provide the evidence.

Red Wings stall on Dylan Larkin trade request

Story Summary

The Detroit Red Wings have put Dylan Larkin’s trade request on hold while they search for a new general manager. Assistant GM Shawn Horcoff is handling day-to-day operations, but trade authority remains suspended. Teams reported as Larkin destinations include the Minnesota Wild, Vegas Golden Knights, Florida Panthers and Dallas Stars, yet none appear willing to meet Detroit’s stated asking price. Observers say a Larkin holdout is unlikely because of contract-breach risk and potential suspension; Larkin is 30 years old and carries an average annual value of $8.7 million through 2030-31.

Key Facts

  • Detroit is searching for a new general manager; that process has paused trade activity involving Dylan Larkin.
  • Assistant GM Shawn Horcoff is managing day-to-day duties but does not have trade authority.
  • Dylan Larkin requested a trade; his preferred destinations reportedly include Minnesota, Vegas, Florida and Dallas.
  • Larkin is 30 years old and his contract carries an average annual value of $8.7 million through the 2030-31 season.
  • Bob Duff of Detroit Hockey Now dismissed the likelihood of a training-camp holdout, citing breach-of-contract risk and possible suspension without pay.
  • Minnesota is believed to be Larkin’s preferred landing spot, but Ansar Khan reported the Wild lack the necessary assets and that Detroit’s minimum asking price is a top-six forward, preferably a centre; Detroit reportedly does not want draft picks and prospects in return.
  • A fan poll reported by Michael Russo and Joe Smith of The Athletic found 68 percent of Wild followers doubt Minnesota can complete the trade given limited trade capital.
  • Adam Proteau of The Hockey News suggested the Boston Bruins as a potential new destination and noted Boston needs more centre depth; Proteau said the Bruins are not on Larkin’s current list but could be an option if pursued.
  • So far there is no indication any interested club will meet Detroit’s asking price; as a result, Larkin’s trade status remains in limbo until a new GM is in place.

IHM Discussion

The market for Dylan Larkin is in suspension because Detroit has removed a key decision-maker from active trade talks. With the GM role vacant, the Red Wings are not engaging in negotiations that would meet their stated price. That is a concrete procedural bottleneck: day-to-day management continues under Shawn Horcoff, but the articleised limits on trade authority mean potential suitors cannot close a deal even if they were prepared to. The immediate effect is predictable from the facts at hand – the trade cannot progress while the club’s top hockey-operations role is unfilled.

Asset valuation is the second structural problem. Multiple reports in the package identify a narrow and demanding price: Detroit is seeking at least a top-six forward, preferably a centre, and is said to reject deals based mainly on draft picks or prospects. That stance shrinks the pool of acceptable returns to teams that possess NHL-ready top-six forwards. Minnesota, the reported preferred destination, lacks that sort of trade capital according to Ansar Khan. Public sentiment in Minnesota – with 68 percent of fans surveyed doubtful – aligns with the inventory problem: even a willing buyer may not have what Detroit wants.

That combination – a trade-authority pause and a high asking price – helps explain why linked clubs such as Vegas, Florida and Dallas have not produced a deal. The Hockey News commentary that Vegas should shy away from Detroit’s demands puts the market view plainly: teams assessing value against cost see the Red Wings’ price as a deterrent. Adam Proteau’s suggestion of Boston widens the lens: if Larkin’s preferred list is too narrow, he or his representatives may need to reset expectations and entertain suitors not on the original list. Proteau’s point that Boston needs centre depth is a reminder that fit can create new options if both sides are willing to expand the conversation.

Why It Matters

This is a market-watch story with roster consequences. If Detroit holds firm on a top-six forward for Larkin, the pool of realistic trade partners is small and deals will be rare. For Larkin, who is under contract through 2030-31 at an $8.7 million AAV, a protracted limbo limits movement ahead of training camp and the regular season. For interested clubs, the combination of limited available assets and Detroit’s firm stance raises the cost of upgrading at centre; that forces teams to weigh whether the immediate roster gain justifies surrendering high-end NHL talent rather than picks or prospects.

What Comes Next

  • The central checkpoint is Detroit hiring a general manager. The Red Wings’ GM search is the procedural trigger that could re-open trade discussions involving Larkin.
  • If the club appoints a GM who signals willingness to trade on different terms, interested teams would re-evaluate whether they can meet the stated minimum return.

IHM Market Outlook

At present the market favours stasis. Detroit’s insistence on an NHL-ready, top-six return limits suitors to teams with expendable top-six forwards, and the reported absence of such assets in Minnesota’s cupboard is a live market constraint. Until Detroit’s front-office picture is resolved, clubs will likely maintain exploratory conversations rather than committing draft capital or prospects. If a new GM relaxes the return profile – for example, by accepting a mixed package with picks or prospects – transaction activity around Larkin could accelerate. As things stand, though, the combination of a GM vacancy and a firm asking price keeps the market cold.

Mini Q&A

Can Larkin force a move by holding out?

Bob Duff has dismissed the idea of a holdout, noting it would risk breach of contract and allow Detroit to suspend Larkin without pay. The package advises that a holdout would not necessarily increase Larkin’s market value.

Which teams are on Larkin’s list?

Reported destinations include the Minnesota Wild, Vegas Golden Knights, Florida Panthers and Dallas Stars.

Is Minnesota the likeliest landing spot?

Minnesota is believed to be Larkin’s preferred destination, but Ansar Khan reported the Wild lack the assets the Red Wings want; a fan poll by Michael Russo and Joe Smith found 68 percent of Wild followers doubt the club can complete the deal.

Could Boston enter the picture?

Adam Proteau suggested the Boston Bruins as a possible alternative; the Bruins were not on Larkin’s reported list but are identified as needing more centre depth and could become an option if pursued.

What is blocking a deal now?

Two things: Detroit’s GM vacancy, which has paused trade authority, and Detroit’s reported asking price of at least a top-six forward, preferably a centre, with limited interest in draft picks or prospects.

Coach Mark Comment

From a coaching and roster-construction angle, the facts show why Detroit’s asking price is understandable. Demanding a top-six forward, ideally a centre, signals the club wants an immediate replacement at a high usage level rather than a developmental asset. For any club considering Larkin, that raises the threshold: you must be able to both afford his cap hit and give up an NHL player who can slot into significant minutes. That dual requirement is exactly what narrows the field of realistic suitors.

IHM Final View

Dylan Larkin’s trade request is a paused market story more than a tactical one. Until Detroit names a general manager or adjusts its return expectations, the combination of a procedural freeze and a high asking price will keep Larkin’s situation in limbo. If either of those two conditions changes, the market could shift quickly; for now, the headline is simple: stalled, not shopped.

Detroit Red Wings vs Winnipeg Jets Preview | Jan 1, 2026 | IHM Premium NHL Analysis

Detroit Red Wings vs Winnipeg Jets Preview | Jan 1, 2026 | IHM Premium NHL Analysis

Detroit Red Wings vs Winnipeg Jets Preview | Jan 1, 2026


Venue: Little Caesars Arena (Detroit, MI)

Open Tactical Preview

This matchup profiles as a tempo control battle. Detroit are at their best when they keep the game on predictable rails: layered puck support, clean five-man exits, and forecheck pressure that forces opponents to make rushed decisions along the wall. At home, that identity often shows early, especially in the first ten minutes, when Detroit can tilt the ice through repeated retrieval wins and quick low-to-high puck movement.

Winnipeg’s path is built around stabilizing the neutral zone and preventing Detroit from stacking consecutive zone sequences. If the Jets allow repeated controlled entries, Detroit can turn the night into extended offensive-zone time, forcing defensive rotations and creating inside looks through screens and second-chance rebounds. Winnipeg must keep their spacing tight between the blue lines and survive the first wave without gifting short shifts back to Detroit.

Special teams and puck management will likely decide who owns the middle of the game. Detroit want short, clean shifts with pucks going forward and bodies arriving on time. Winnipeg need disciplined clears, support underneath the puck, and fewer turnovers at the top of the circles. If the Jets start chasing, the game can become a Detroit pressure loop rather than a balanced exchange.

What to watch: Detroit’s forecheck timing (F1 pressure with F2 support), Winnipeg’s exit quality under pressure, and net-front layers on both sides. When Detroit get bodies to the crease and keep pucks alive at the line, their offensive shifts tend to produce clusters of chances instead of single looks.

Quick Q&A

Q: What is the key tactical matchup in Detroit vs Winnipeg?
A: Detroit’s forecheck and zone-time identity versus Winnipeg’s ability to exit cleanly and control the neutral zone.

Q: What usually decides games like this?
A: Puck management under pressure, net-front execution, and which team can sustain offensive-zone time in waves.

Q: Where is the game played?
A: Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, Michigan.


Note: This is the open tactical preview. The full breakdown and Coach Mark verdict are published inside the Premium section.

IHM Note: Full Premium Breakdown and Coach Mark verdict are available for Premium members.

Signature:
IceHockeyMan (IHM) Newsroom
Premium NHL Analysis by Coach Mark Lehtonen

NHL Gameday Roundup - All Final Scores (17 November) | IHM News

NHL Gameday Roundup – All Final Scores (17 November) | IHM News

NHL Gameday Roundup – All Final Scores (17 November)

Date: November 17, 2025 – Author: IHM News

A tight three-game NHL slate delivered late drama in Minnesota, a bruising Central-Metro showdown in Detroit, and a controlled, system-driven win in Denver. Here’s how every matchup unfolded through the IHM Performance Metrics lens.

Minnesota Wild 3-2 Vegas Golden Knights (AOT)

The Wild punched above their weight again with another trademark home-ice grinder. Vegas carried more rush speed early and opened the scoring, but Minnesota’s defensive layers (low-slot stack + compact weak-side support) neutralised the Golden Knights’ middle-lane attacks as the game progressed.

By the second period, Minnesota’s forecheck began forcing clean turnovers, and the Wild controlled the majority of O-zone shifts. Vegas generated isolated chances off the rush, but their extended possessions were limited. In overtime, Minnesota’s puck support and short-change structure created the decisive mismatch on the winning goal.

  • Shots on goal: MIN – VGK – (not provided fully by source, omit here)
  • Special teams: Tight, low-event PK battle; neither side gained long momentum.
  • Territorial flow: Wild controlled O-zone time in the final 30 minutes.
  • Trend: Minnesota continue to win “structure-first” games even when out-skilled.

Coach Mark comment: Minnesota’s identity is clear: layered slot protection, smart forecheck timing and short shifts. Vegas struggled to create second looks once the Wild adjusted the neutral-zone angles.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

  • Why did Minnesota outlast Vegas? Their late-game structure and puck support improved dramatically, reducing Vegas to perimeter looks.
  • Was OT decisive or random? Not random – Minnesota controlled the first two OT shifts and created sustained pressure.
  • What limited Vegas offensively? Poor inside-lane access and Wild defenders winning net-front body positioning.

New York Rangers 1-2 Detroit Red Wings

This one played out like a playoff rehearsal – tight, physical, and low-margin. Detroit leaned heavily on their forecheck pressure, forcing the Rangers’ defence into repeated retrieval issues. New York generated sporadic rush entries but struggled to build multi-shot sequences inside the zone.

Detroit’s middle-six created the decisive push early in the second period, turning consecutive zone cycles into a high-danger finish. The Rangers answered with a quick transition goal but were unable to break through Detroit’s layers again, especially as the Wings shut down cross-ice seams.

  • Special teams: Minimal impact; even-strength dictated the flow.
  • Puck management: Detroit’s exits were cleaner; NYR had issues under pressure.
  • Goalie edge: Detroit earned it with controlled rebounds and clean sightlines.

Coach Mark comment: Detroit’s forecheck detail was the difference. New York couldn’t consistently beat the first layer, and their best looks came early before Detroit tightened the gaps.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

  • Did Detroit actually control this game? Yes – especially through 5-on-5 territorial play.
  • Why did the Rangers struggle? Their breakouts failed under pressure; too many chipped exits and lost races.
  • What swung the game? Detroit’s second-period O-zone cycles and their ability to deny NYR’s east-west passing.

Colorado Avalanche 4-1 New York Islanders

After a flat first period, Colorado flipped the game entirely with a dominant second frame driven by pace, clean neutral-zone exits, and aggressive activation from the blue line. The Islanders opened the scoring, but the Avalanche’s pressure forced turnovers and produced two quick goals that changed the flow completely.

Once ahead, Colorado dictated tempo. Their penalty kill remained compact and denied cross-ice seams, while their forecheck dismantled the Islanders’ attempts to generate sustained O-zone play. New York’s only dangerous window came early, before being out-skated and out-supported in the final 40 minutes.

  • Shots on goal: COL 29, NYI 29
  • Shot quality: COL created more interior looks; NYI mostly perimeter.
  • Goalie edge: Avalanche netminder delivered 28/29 (96.5%).
  • Special teams: Colorado’s PK strong; no momentum swings for NYI.

Coach Mark comment: Colorado won this game by trusting their identity after a poor first period. Once they started attacking in layers with the D activating and the forwards supporting underneath, the Islanders’ defensive box began to stretch and openings appeared in the seam. Over 60 minutes the Avalanche played the more repeatable hockey - strong gap control, tight neutral-zone structure and quick support on retrievals.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

  • How did Colorado overturn the 1-0 deficit? By accelerating play through the neutral zone and activating their defencemen on controlled entries.
  • Was the 4-1 final deserved? Yes – possession, quality and structure all tilted toward Colorado after the first period.
  • Why did the Islanders fade? They struggled to exit cleanly under Colorado’s forecheck and generated few second-chance opportunities.

More NHL news on IHM → https://icehockeyman.com


Panarin drives Rangers past Red Wings 4-1 on the road | IHM News

Panarin drives Rangers past Red Wings 4-1 on the road | IHM News

IHM NEWS – Panarin drives Rangers past Red Wings 4-1 on the road

Date: November 8, 2025  |  Author: IHM News

DETROIT – This is what it looks like when your stars set the tone. Artemi Panarin produced three points (1G, 2A) and Jonathan Quick turned aside 32 shots as the New York Rangers handled the Detroit Red Wings 4-1 at Little Caesars Arena, pushing New York to 7-1-1 away from home and extending their run of dominance over Detroit to seven straight wins.

Panarin drives Rangers past Red Wings 4-1 on the road | IHM News

Panarin’s line dictated pace and possession from the opening faceoff. Mika Zibanejad stacked two primary assists, Alexis Lafrenière snapped a 12-game goal drought and added an assist, and depth scoring arrived on time from Will Cuylle, whose first-period power-play strike set the tone.

Our best players were our best players,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “We’ve generated looks; tonight we finished.”

Detroit’s push was real. J.T. Compher tied it 1-1 in the first, and Patrick Kane returned from injury with six shots in 17:41 – including a near-gift after picking off a Quick outlet that the veteran goalie and Braden Schneider scrambled to erase. But between Quick’s economy of movement and the Rangers’ five-man layers through the neutral zone, Detroit never found a second wave.

How it happened

  • 1-0 NYR (6:46 1st, PPG): Will Cuylle trailed the rush and buried Zibanejad’s cross-ice feed.
  • 1-1 (11:06 1st): Compher walked into a quick release from Mason Appleton’s feed behind the net, beating Quick high glove.
  • 2-1 NYR (4:52 2nd): Michigan native Noah Laba tapped in Lafrenière’s crease-edge pass for his hometown moment and Lafrenière’s 200th NHL point.
  • 3-1 NYR (7:29 3rd): Panarin finished a Zibanejad delivery in stride – a scorer’s touch through a small window.
  • 4-1 NYR (8:27 3rd): Lafrenière from the slot to close it out.

Quick’s best sequences came late in the second: a point-blank denial on Kane after the interception, then a second-chance blocker swipe that killed the building’s surge. “He bails us out after our mistakes,” Schneider said. “Tonight he even cleaned up his own.”

Detroit coach Todd McLellan was blunt: “Physically there, but not sharp between the ears. When you’re not crisp, those look-in chances don’t fall.”

Numbers that matter

  • Road form: Rangers 7-1-1 away, structure travels.
  • Panarin vs DET: 28 points in last 16 vs Red Wings.
  • Goaltending: Quick .970 SV% at 5v5 on the night (32 saves overall).
  • Special teams: NYR score first on the PP; even-strength shot quality tilted their way in periods 2-3.

Coach Mark comment

New York solved Detroit’s first-touch pressure by widening the neutral-zone entries and letting Panarin attack off the inside-out delay. That pulled Detroit’s weak-side defender up a half-step, and the Rangers hit seams behind it (see Cuylle PPG and the Lafrenière/Laba connection). Quick’s puck tracking was elite; minimal rebounds, square early. This is sustainable road hockey.