Tag: Anaheim Ducks

Anaheim Ducks 4-3 Boston Bruins – Physical battle in Anaheim | IHM News

November 20, 2025 – Author: IHM News

Anaheim Ducks 4-3 Boston Bruins

Anaheim survived a heavy Boston shot volume to claim a 4-3 home win, with Scott Moore burying the late game-winner after a night full of hits, blocked shots and special-teams swings.

In Anaheim, the Ducks leaned into a classic underdog template: fast start, physical edge and a goaltender ready to absorb a barrage. Despite being outshot 39-33, Anaheim turned opportunistic offense and a committed shot-blocking effort into two points against a Bruins team that pushed hard in all three periods. The Ducks built an early 2-0 cushion, survived multiple Boston responses and finally sealed it when Scott Moore converted late in regulation, capping one of Anaheim’s grittiest wins of the young season.

First period – Ducks punch first, Bruins answer late

Anaheim came out sharp and direct. Just 2:29 into the opening frame, Jansen Harkins made it 1-0 Ducks, finishing a quick sequence after sustained forecheck pressure with help from Riley Johnston and Nikita Nesterenko. A few minutes later, the building erupted again when veteran defender Radko Gudas jumped into the rush and pushed the lead to 2-0 at 6:29, converting a feed from Mason McTavish with Benoit Sennecke also drawing an assist.

Boston slowly settled into its game, using controlled entries and point shots to tilt the ice. The Bruins were rewarded on the power play when Morgan Geekie struck at 14:58, ripping home a one-timer on the man advantage with Hampus Lindholm and Pavel Zacha picking up the helpers to cut the deficit to 2-1.

The tone turned nasty late in the frame as Frank Vatrano and Alex Steeves dropped the gloves at 19:32, a full-on heavyweight bout that underlined just how physical this matchup had become. Anaheim carried a 2-1 lead and plenty of emotion into the first intermission.

Second period – disallowed goal and traded blows

Boston thought it had its equalizer early in the second period when McTavish appeared to extend Anaheim’s advantage, but video review wiped the goal off the board for interference, giving the Bruins a lifeline.

The Ducks regrouped and re-established control on special teams. At 13:47, Ryan Strome restored a two-goal cushion on the power play, cashing in from the bumper spot with McTavish and Colton Gauthier providing the setup for a 3-1 lead.

Boston refused to go away. The Bruins continued to drive pucks from the points and funnel traffic to the crease. Their persistence paid off at 18:27 when Michael Eyssimont made it 3-2, finishing off a greasy net-front sequence after Nikita Zadorov kept the play alive at the blue line. The goal ensured the Bruins would head into the third within a single shot despite chasing most of the night.

Third period – Bruins rally, Moore wins it late

The final frame opened with more nastiness as Gudas and Truchon-Viel squared off in another fight at 2:13, with the Bruins forward also tagged for an instigator minor and a misconduct. That sequence gave Anaheim another chance on special teams, but Boston’s penalty kill held firm and kept the game within one.

The Bruins kept pushing and eventually tied it through special teams again. On a third-period power play, Geekie delivered his second of the night at 7:39, wiring home a quick release off a cross-seam feed from David Pastrnak with Lindholm collecting another assist to level the score at 3-3.

Instead of folding, Anaheim responded with a composed final stretch. The Ducks absorbed Boston’s rushes, blocked lanes in the neutral zone and waited for their moment. It arrived at 16:25 when Scott Moore jumped into a broken play, receiving a feed from Elias Carlsson and Trevor Terry before beating the Bruins goaltender for the 4-3 game-winner. Anaheim then locked down the final minutes, leaning on their structure and a locked-in goaltender to secure a statement victory.

Numbers box

Shots on goal: Anaheim 33, Boston 39
Shooting percentage: Anaheim 12.12% (4/33), Boston 7.69% (3/39)
Blocked shots: Anaheim 21, Boston 18
Goaltender saves: Anaheim 36/39, Boston 29/33
Penalties: Anaheim 4, Boston 6
Penalty minutes (PIM): Anaheim 14, Boston 26
Key performers: Geekie (2 G, PP threat), Moore (GWG), Gudas (goal and physical edge), Strome (PPG)

Coach Mark comment

Anaheim followed a perfect home-ice blueprint. They started on time, won the trench battles and used structure to survive Boston’s talent. When you get that level of commitment to blocking shots and winning second pucks, you give your scorer a chance to be the hero, and Moore finished the job.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

How did Anaheim win despite being outshot?

The Ducks protected the middle of the ice, blocked 21 shots and forced Boston into a lot of low-percentage looks. Their goaltender handled the rest with a 92.31% save percentage.

What role did special teams play?

Both teams scored key power-play goals, but Anaheim’s timing was better. Strome’s second-period PPG restored control for the Ducks, while the Bruins’ units were chasing the game to pull even.

Who set the physical tone?

Gudas, Vatrano and Steeves turned this into a grinding, playoff-style game with their fights and heavy hits. That physical tone suited Anaheim’s identity and helped slow Boston’s skill through the neutral zone.

What does this result mean for Boston?

The Bruins generated enough volume to earn a point, but their game management in the first period and late-game defending cost them. It is a reminder that shot totals alone do not guarantee results when you lose the slot and net-front battles.

Did Anaheim find a repeatable formula?

Yes. Strong starts, hard forecheck pressure, disciplined layers in the defensive zone and a direct power play are all sustainable habits, especially at home where they control matchups and last change.

For more NHL recaps, tactical breakdowns and IHM Performance Metrics features, visit the main NHL section on IceHockeyMan.com. More NHL news on IHM.

Minnesota Wild 4-3 Carolina Hurricanes (SO): Wallstedt Steals the Points | IHM News

Colorado Avalanche 4-1 Anaheim Ducks | IHM Game Recap

Colorado Avalanche 4-1 Anaheim Ducks

November 12, 2025 – Author: IHM News

Wedgewood turns away 35 shots; Necas nets the dagger on the power play as Colorado controls the third.

Colorado snapped out quickly and never really let go, beating the Anaheim Ducks 4-1 at home after a wire-to-wire, shot-heavy night. Artturi Lehkonen scored 28 seconds in, Gabriel Landeskog restored the lead in the second, and Martin Necas delivered the key third-period power-play strike before an empty-netter sealed it. Scott Wedgewood handled the rest with a composed 35-save performance, outdueling Lukas Dostal as the Avalanche managed special teams and game state down the stretch.

How it happened

First period – 1-1. Colorado set the tone immediately: Lehkonen finished from the slot at 00:28 off touches from Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar. Anaheim answered late when Leo Carlsson tied it 1-1 at 18:16, capping a greasy sequence around the crease. The frame also featured a parade of minors that foreshadowed a special-teams-tilted night.

Second period – 2-1 COL. With the game tightening, the Avalanche leaned on their forecheck and blue-line activation. Gabriel Landeskog snapped the 1-1 deadlock at 11:37, finishing a feed from Valeri Nichushkin with defenseman Sam Malinski jumping into the play.

Third period – Avalanche close the door. A delay-of-game minor put Anaheim under pressure, and Colorado cashed: Necas ripped the PPG at 07:02 (Lehkonen, MacKinnon) for a crucial two-goal cushion. With Dostal pulled, Parker Kelly iced it into the empty net at 17:39 (MacKinnon, Nelson). From there, Wedgewood’s structure-clean lanes, square on first shots-did the rest.

Numbers Box

Shots on goal: COL 36, ANA 36
Shots off target: COL 15, ANA 9
Shooting %: COL 11.11% (4/36), ANA 2.78% (1/36)
Blocked shots: COL 19, ANA 13
Goalie saves: Wedgewood (COL) 35/36 – 97.22%; Dostal (ANA) 32/36 – 91.43%
Penalties: COL 3, ANA 5
PIM: COL 6, ANA 10
Power play: COL 1/5, ANA 0/3
Notable: Lehkonen GWG + 2-point night; MacKinnon 2 A; Necas PPG; Colorado wins the special-teams battle.

Team Notes

Colorado: Fast start metric matters-Lehkonen’s first-minute goal set the ice tilt. Blue line activation (Makar/Toews/Malinski) drove the middle frame.
Anaheim: Created volume (36 SOG) but struggled to get interior looks; 0-for-4 on the power play proved costly.

Coach Mark Comment

Colorado’s neutral-zone work funneled Anaheim outside and protected the slot. The third-period detail on the PP was clinical- quick puck speed, middle-lane presence, and a one-touch finish from Necas. Wedgewood’s reads were calm, especially on east-west.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

Q1: What was the true separator at 5-on-5?

A: Colorado’s controlled exits and layered entries-defenseman activation plus F3 discipline-tilted possession even with shots equal.

Q2: How did special teams impact the result?

A: The Avalanche went 1/4 and denied Anaheim on all four attempts; the single PPG arrived at a clutch game state to make it 3-1.

Q3: Which matchup mattered most?

A: MacKinnon’s line versus Anaheim’s top six; Colorado generated interior touches and drew the key penalty that led to the dagger.

Q4: Goalie edge?

A: Wedgewood (97.22% SV) out-performed Dostal (91.43%), particularly on first-chance looks from the dots.

Q5: What’s the takeaway for the next meeting?

A: If Anaheim doesn’t win the net-front and PP entries, Colorado’s pace and blue-line support will keep dictating shot quality.

More NHL news on IHM

Top-10 Hockey News & Rumors of the Week

Anaheim Ducks 4-1 Winnipeg Jets | IHM Game Recap

Anaheim Ducks 4-1 Winnipeg Jets

Date: November 10, 2025
Author: IHM News

Ducks dominate Jets with special-teams precision, extend home momentum

Anaheim delivered another composed, structured home performance, beating the Winnipeg Jets 4-1 behind two power-play goals from Leo Carlsson and a standout all-situations night from rookie Beckett Sennecke. Winnipeg generated a shot edge but struggled to break Anaheim’s layered defensive zone reads, while Lukas Dostal delivered calm, technically precise goaltending to steady the Ducks throughout.

Game Flow

1st Period: Anaheim controlled pace early and struck first at 07:18 when Beckett Sennecke buried a rebound created through Corey Gauthier’s entry pressure. Physicality ramped up, but the Ducks kept composure. At 19:03, Carlsson doubled the lead on the power play, snapping a one-timer off a crisp Terry-to-Kreider passing rotation for 2-0.

2nd Period: Winnipeg responded quickly at 04:22 through Kyle Connor, finishing off a Morrissey-Scheifele sequence. Anaheim stabilized fast, and Sennecke answered at 11:48 with his second of the night after controlled middle-lane support from McTavish and Gauthier, restoring a 3-1 lead.

3rd Period: Early in the period at 02:46, Carlsson struck again on the power play, timing the weak-side seam perfectly for 4-1. Winnipeg thought they pulled one back at 19:13, but a successful goalie-interference challenge overturned the goal. Anaheim closed out confidently.

Numbers Box

Shots on Goal: ANA 21, WPG 24
Shots off Target: ANA 23, WPG 19
Power Play: ANA 2/4, WPG 0/4
Blocked Shots: ANA 15, WPG 14
Saves: Dostal 23/24 (95.8%), Comrie 16/20 (80%)
PIM: ANA 8, WPG 8
Notable: Sennecke 2G, Carlsson 2 PPG goals, Ducks win special-teams battle

Coach Mark Comment

Carlsson’s timing on the power play keeps getting better. Sennecke showed real poise in tight areas, and Anaheim’s defensive reads were simple but effective. When the Ducks control their neutral-zone tempo like this, they’re difficult to break.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

Why did Anaheim control this matchup?

Their special teams dictated pace, and their neutral-zone layers forced Winnipeg into predictable entries. Dostal handled the rest.

What stood out about Beckett Sennecke’s performance?

His goal-scoring came from smart support routes and quick-release positioning. He consistently attacked inside ice.

How did Winnipeg generate more shots but fewer dangerous chances?

Anaheim kept most attempts to the perimeter. Jets lacked sustained slot penetration, especially at even strength.

What made Carlsson’s power-play goals possible?

Elite timing, clean east-west puck rotation, and Winnipeg’s passive penalty-kill spacing.

Is Anaheim’s home performance trend sustainable?

Yes. Their defensive structure and transition clarity hold up well against most opponents.

More NHL news available on IHM.

IHM Academy – Performance Metrics Masterclass • Lesson 1

Vegas Golden Knights Fall 3-4 in Overtime as Anaheim’s Young Core Steals a Statement Win

Date: November 9, 2025
Author: IHM Newsroom

Game Recap

The Anaheim Ducks delivered another statement performance, outlasting the Vegas Golden Knights 3-4 in overtime inside T-Mobile Arena. What looked early like a routine home win for Vegas quickly unraveled into a showcase of Anaheim’s fast transition game and the dominance of their emerging core.

Vegas struck first when Brett Howden redirected a feed from Karlsson and Hanifin at 05:47 to make it 1-0. But Anaheim answered late in the period as Frank Vatrano finished a clean passing sequence from Zellweger and Trouba, leveling the score at 1-1.

Second Period: Ducks Surge Takes Control

The middle frame belonged entirely to Anaheim. The Ducks punished Vegas on every mistake, winning races, stacking possession time, and forcing the Golden Knights to defend for extended stretches.

Leo Carlsson took over the game with two goals – a quick one at 10:39 and another at 16:50 – both driven by Anaheim’s aggressive puck movement and elite zone entries. Vegas struggled with discipline, taking multiple penalties and losing structure in their breakouts.

Through 40 minutes, Anaheim led 1-3 and looked fully in control.

Third Period: Vegas Fights Back

Vegas responded with urgency. Pavel Dorofeyev cut the deficit to 2-3 at 03:56 on a power play, finishing after a slick setup from Jack Eichel. The arena lifted, momentum flipped, and Anaheim got pinned in their own end.

At 14:53, Kaedan Korczak tied the game 3-3 after a heavy shift by the Marner-Barbashev line. The Golden Knights pushed hard for the winner, generating rush chances and back-to-back looks for Eichel and Marner.

Anaheim held on and forced overtime.

Overtime: Ducks Close It Out

OT lasted only 4:28. A broken play turned into a 2-on-1 for Anaheim, and Jacob Trouba buried the game-winner off a perfect pass from Carlsson, sealing a dramatic 3-4 victory for the Ducks.

IHM Verdict

Anaheim Ducks: A resilient, structured, confident team. Their young group doesn’t blink under pressure, and their transition pace is elite. They continue to look like a legitimate top-3 Pacific team.

Vegas Golden Knights: The quality is there, but the discipline is not. Penalties, sloppy breakouts, and late neutral-zone turnovers cost them a winnable game. Even at home, control slipped quickly once Anaheim started dictating pace.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

Why did Anaheim control most of the second period?

Anaheim’s controlled exits and clean entries overwhelmed Vegas. With Zellweger and LaCombe driving tempo, the Ducks consistently attacked Vegas in motion and created mismatches inside the offensive zone.

What changed for Vegas in the third period?

Vegas simplified their approach – direct entries, more inside-lane pressure, and increased shot volume from the Eichel line. Their forecheck finally disrupted Anaheim’s rhythm, creating turnovers and rebound chances.

What was the biggest deciding factor in overtime?

Anaheim executed with precision. One broken puck battle turned into instant transition, and their young core read the 2-on-1 perfectly. Trouba’s finish was clinical, but Carlsson’s patience created the moment.

Did penalties affect the game flow?

Yes – significantly. Vegas took several momentum-killing minors, especially in the second period, giving Anaheim full control. Anaheim stayed composed and capitalized on the extra ice.

How important was Leo Carlsson to Anaheim’s win?

Carlsson was dominant – two goals, an OT assist, strong puck touches, and elite reads. He controlled tempo in key moments and outplayed Vegas’ top centers shift-for-shift.

Signature: IHM Newsroom - The Fastest, Sharpest Hockey Coverage Worldwide

Colorado humiliates Oilers 1-9 on home ice; McDavid’s lone goal can’t stop rout | IHM News

IHM Performance Metrics Report: Why the Ducks and Utah Mammoth Suddenly Look Like Analytics Superpowers

Date: November 8, 2025 | Author: IHM News Analytics

Why the Ducks and Utah Mammoth suddenly look like analytics superpowers

A deep breakdown of two surprising engines of the 2025-26 NHL season

The first month of the season has delivered two unexpected machines of chaos: Anaheim Ducks, suddenly the brightest offensive show in the West, and Utah Mammoth, who instantly found an elite play-driver in Nick Schmaltz.

But behind the flurries of goals, comebacks and nightly highlights lies a far more revealing truth. This is an analytics-based evolution built on:

high-danger efficiency
elite transitional play
explosive speed clusters
possession metrics that indicate sustainability

IHM EDGE broke down both teams under the microscope – here’s what we found.

🦆 SECTION I – Anaheim Ducks: Inside the engine of a sudden powerhouse

1. High-danger ecosystem

Anaheim aren’t just scoring a lot – they are scoring the right way. The Ducks have already generated 28 high-danger goals, more than most of their division combined. Chris Kreider and Cutter Gauthier are currently among the top high-danger producers in the NHL.

Carlsson, Sennecke and Terry form a constant pressure triangle built on:

fast zone entries
short-link passing
finishes from the kill zone (2-4 meters)

This is not randomness - it’s a system. And it works.

2. Cutter Gauthier: The EDGE monster exceeding every projection

Gauthier is one of the most “unstoppable” analytical profiles in the league right now. His EDGE metrics look engineered:

average shot speed – 97th percentile
speed bursts – 97th percentile
hardest shot – 93rd percentile
mid-range goals – leads NHL
Goals Above Projected – +5.91 (1st in NHL)

He scores shots that models classify as low-probability. When a player beats the model itself – we’re dealing with elite talent.

3. Territorial control – Ice Tilt as a predictor of future success

Anaheim currently rank No. 1 in the NHL in first-period Ice Tilt advantage. This means they take control of rink territory and game tempo early.

Carlsson (+63) and Gauthier (+60) dominate 5v5 shot differential like established superstars – at age 20 and 21.

4. Goaltending stability

Dostal has quietly become a stabilizer:

elite mid-range SV%
7-3-1 record
5v5 save% above league average

For a team that has lacked a foundation in net for years, this is transformative.

🦬 SECTION II – Utah Mammoth: Schmaltz’s reinvention and the rise of a new top-six

Utah play fast, aggressive and structured – but their entire offensive shape is glued together by one player: Nick Schmaltz, the most underrated starter of the season.

1. Shot profile: dangerous from every lane

Schmaltz is one of the rare forwards producing elite volume from all three shot tiers:

high-danger – 96th percentile
mid-range – 95th percentile
long-range – 92nd percentile

42 shots in 12 games – the best pace of his entire career. Utah are top-two in shot differential, which confirms structure, not luck.

2. High-danger finishing touch

Five high-danger goals – fourth in the NHL. Two goals on deflections – placing him in rare company with Crosby and Miles Wood.

Schmaltz has long been a high-danger creator, but now he’s finishing at a career-high level.

3. Speed metrics: Utah = a missile

Schmaltz:

20+ mph bursts – 84th percentile
total distance – 93rd percentile

Utah as a whole:

Cooley – second-fastest skater in the NHL
team – 4th in total speed bursts
shots allowed per game – 2nd fewest in NHL

This is a team that skates fast without losing structural discipline.

4. Chemistry: Keller – Schmaltz – Hayton

This long-developing trio finally has the personnel to play at full throttle. They drive Utah’s PP1 and tempo game, making possession swings almost automatic.

🚀 SECTION III – What Ducks and Mammoth have in common

Both teams:

dominate high-danger creation
apply speed as a core identity, not just a tool
are led by young stars who already think like veterans
show sustainable possession trends
benefit from EDGE-positive profiles across the top six
look structurally built, not statistically lucky

🎯 IHM VERDICT

Ducks:

Legitimate contenders for a top-2 finish in the Pacific Division. Their metrics match conference finalists – not pretenders.

Utah Mammoth:

Massively underrated playoff candidates. Their top-six is good enough to drag them into contention all season.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

Why are the Anaheim Ducks performing so well this season?

The Ducks rank among the NHL’s best teams in high-danger scoring, first-period territorial control (Ice Tilt) and 5-on-5 possession metrics. Their young core, led by Carlsson and Gauthier, drives elite shot volume and transition pace.

What makes Cutter Gauthier’s analytics profile elite?

Gauthier ranks in the 93rd-99th percentiles in shot power, speed bursts, midrange scoring and goals above expected. He consistently beats projected goal models.

Why is Nick Schmaltz breaking out for the Utah Mammoth?

Schmaltz produces high-volume shots from every scoring tier and ranks top-five in high-danger goals this season. His skating metrics and chemistry with Keller elevate Utah’s entire top six.

Are the Ducks and Mammoth legitimate playoff contenders?

Both teams show sustainable shot-differential and chance-generation metrics, suggesting long-term competitiveness rather than early-season variance.

NHL Match Preview · Philadelphia Flyers vs Ottawa Senators

Ducks extend win streak to 5 with stars 7-5 comeback over Stars | IHM News

Ducks extend win streak to 5 with 7-5 comeback over Stars | IHM News

Date: November 7, 2025 | Author: IHM News

Ducks extend winning streak to 5 with 7-5 comeback in Dallas

Anaheim erases early 2-0 deficit, scores four straight, and survives special-teams chaos to beat Stars in a 12-goal thriller

DALLAS – The Anaheim Ducks are officially one of the hottest teams in the NHL.
Not with luck, not with overtime squeaks – but with identity, structure, and relentless pace.

On Thursday night at American Airlines Center, Anaheim stormed back from a 2-0 first-period deficit and powered through a chaotic, penalty-filled game to defeat the Dallas Stars 7-5, stretching their winning streak to five games and improving to 9-3-1.

Dallas got goals from Wyatt Johnston (2), Tyler Seguin, Mikko Rantanen, Roope Hintz, but defensive breakdowns and turnovers buried them. Jake Oettinger finished with 17 saves.

Anaheim answered with scoring from everywhere:
Chris Kreider, Ian Moore, Cutter Gauthier, Olen Zellweger, Leo Carlsson, Mason McTavish, and a second one from Kreider. Lukas Dostal stopped 21 of 26.

🚨 Stars jump early – Johnston takes over the first period

Dallas opened the game with clean execution on back-to-back power plays.

At 12:48, Wyatt Johnston ripped home a mid-slot one-timer off a pass from Mikko Rantanen for 1-0.
He doubled the lead at 16:18, barely tipping a Miro Heiskanen point shot for his ninth of the year.

Through 20 minutes, Dallas led 2-0 and looked in full control.

They would not look that way again.

🔥 Anaheim erupts – four goals in 13 minutes flip the game

The Ducks opened the second period like a team shot out of a cannon.

Just 76 seconds in, Chris Kreider sprinted down the left side and snapped a blocker-side laser to cut it to 2-1.

92 seconds later, rookie defenseman Ian Moore scored his first NHL goal, hammering in a perfect crease-level pass from Ryan Poehling to tie it 2-2.

Dallas briefly regained the lead when Tyler Seguin beat Dostal on a breakaway, but Anaheim again answered instantly:

Cutter Gauthier: turnover forced by Killorn → right-circle shot → 3-3

Olen Zellweger: power-play finish after a wild cross-ice misdirection → 4-3

Entering the third period, Anaheim had completely flipped the script.

⚡ Third-period storm – Ducks pull away again

Just 16 seconds into the final frame, Kreider tipped in a point shot from Drew Helleson for 5-3.

Mikko Rantanen struck back on the power play at 1:50 (5-4), but Anaheim responded with the dagger – a shorthanded strike:

Leo Carlsson, reading the play perfectly, jumped on a loose puck during a broken rush and buried it for 6-4.

Roope Hintz deflected a Rantanen shot at 16:39 to make it 6-5, but the Ducks iced it when Mason McTavish hit the empty net at 18:07.

📊 Key numbers

Shots: Dallas 25 – Anaheim 24

Power play: Stars 3/5 – Ducks 2/5

Special-teams goals: 6 total

Scorers: 12 different goal scorers combined

Coach Mark comment
Anaheim is playing with tempo and layers. Their middle-lane drive is elite right now, and their weak-side activation creates constant second-wave threats. This comeback wasn’t luck – it was structural pressure. Dallas lost its gap discipline in the neutral zone and never recovered. The Ducks look like a team trending toward real contention if this pace continues.

Celebrini leads Sharks past Kraken 6-1 with 3-point night | IHM News