Category: IHM Newsroom

Official IceHockeyMan editorial hub. Breaking hockey updates, league insights, and major headlines from the world of ice hockey.

Bill Guerin confident over Quinn Hughes’ contract situation

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

General manager Bill Guerin says he is not worried about losing 26-year-old American defenceman Quinn Hughes, who has not yet signed an extension. Guerin said he has a good relationship with Hughes and the player’s agent, and described contract talks as an ongoing process. Hughes has until 15 September to sign an eight-year contract before the maximum term falls to seven years. Guerin also referred to a similar negotiation last year that resulted in an eight-year deal for Kirill Kaprizov.

Key Facts

  • Bill Guerin said he feels secure about the situation around 26-year-old American defenceman Quinn Hughes and is not worried about losing him.
  • Guerin described being ‘on the inside’ as a luxury and said negotiations are a process in which the club must find out what the player wants and what is needed to keep him happy.
  • Guerin said he and the team have a good relationship with Quinn Hughes and his agent and that communication is ongoing.
  • Guerin recalled a similar situation the previous year when the team reached an eight-year deal with Kirill Kaprizov, described as then the NHL’s largest contract, worth 1.3 billion kronor.
  • Hughes has until 15 September to sign an eight-year contract before the maximum contract length is reduced to seven years.

IHM Discussion

Guerin’s public calm rests on the relationship he describes with Hughes and the player’s agent. He frames the matter as a negotiation rather than an immediate problem, with regular communication continuing between the parties.

The 15 September deadline adds a practical consideration. If both sides want the option of an eight-year agreement, the available window is limited; after that, the maximum term falls to seven years. Guerin’s reference to Kaprizov’s eight-year deal underlines his experience of managing a major contract negotiation.

Why It Matters

Contract talks for an elite, 26-year-old defenceman matter because they set the salary and term benchmarks for comparable players and shape a club’s short- and medium-term roster planning. The potential shift from a US$7.85 million cap hit this season to a significantly higher figure in a new deal will affect the team’s cap flexibility. The 15 September window for a possible eight-year contract is a practical deadline that shortens the club’s negotiating runway if both sides want maximal term.

Mini Q&A

What did Bill Guerin say about Quinn Hughes’ contract situation?

Guerin said he feels secure, described being ‘on the inside’ as a luxury, and called contract talks a process; he added that he and the club have a good relationship with Quinn Hughes and his agent and that communication is ongoing.

Does Quinn Hughes have a deadline to sign a longer deal?

Yes. Reportedly, Hughes has until 15 September to sign an eight-year contract before the maximum permitted length drops to seven years.

What is the next contract deadline for Hughes?

Hughes has until 15 September to sign an eight-year contract. After that, the maximum permitted term falls to seven years.

Coach Mark Comment

From a coaching perspective, clarity around a leading defenceman’s future helps long-term planning. Until a deal is completed, however, the focus remains on preparing the group for the season rather than projecting pairings or special-teams roles too far ahead.

What Comes Next

15 September is the deadline for Hughes to sign an eight-year contract before the maximum term falls to seven years.

IHM Final View

Guerin has struck a measured public tone, stressing strong relationships, regular communication and the need to work through the negotiation. The 15 September window for an eight-year contract is the next clear checkpoint.

2026-27 fantasy hockey point projections released

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

New 84-game point projections for forwards and defencemen are available ahead of the 2026-27 season. Connor McDavid (EDM) leads forwards at 135 points, while Cale Makar (COL) heads defencemen at 87. The estimates are intended as a fantasy-draft baseline, particularly for points-only leagues, and account for factors including past performance, projected line combinations, power-play usage, injury history, upside, age and contract status.

Key Facts

  • Projections are for an 84-game season and quantify expected point totals for forwards and defencemen.
  • Connor McDavid, F, EDM: 135 projected points – the highest total among forwards.
  • Nathan MacKinnon, F, COL: 130 projected points (second among forwards).
  • Nikita Kucherov, F, TBL: 125 projected points (third among forwards).
  • Macklin Celebrini, F, SJS: 122 projected points (fourth among forwards).
  • Leon Draisaitl, F, EDM: 117 projected points (fifth among forwards).
  • Cale Makar, D, COL: 87 projected points – the highest total among defencemen.
  • Evan Bouchard, D, EDM: 86 projected points (second among defencemen).
  • Quinn Hughes, D, MIN: 86 projected points (tied for second among defencemen).
  • Connor Bedard, F, CHI is shown with an 81-point projection and marked (INJ.) in the list.
  • The projections were developed using factors including past regular-season and playoff performance, projected line combinations, power-play usage, injury history or concern, sleeper upside, anticipated regression or bounce-back candidacy, age and contract status.
  • The projections are described as safe point estimates that do not indicate a player’s ceiling or floor and should be used as a basis for fantasy draft picks, especially in points-only leagues.

IHM Discussion

The projections establish a points-based hierarchy for fantasy managers preparing for 2026-27. Connor McDavid’s 135-point estimate puts him ahead of Nathan MacKinnon (130) and Nikita Kucherov (125), while Macklin Celebrini is projected for 122.

On the blue line, Cale Makar leads at 87 points, with Evan Bouchard and Quinn Hughes each projected for 86. In points-only formats, that group offers rare scoring potential from defence.

These are described as safe estimates rather than ceilings or floors. Connor Bedard is listed at 81 points and marked injured, while Seth Jarvis, Troy Terry, Kevin Fiala and Owen Tippett are also noted among key injuries or absences. The figures are useful draft baselines, not guarantees.

Why It Matters

For points-only fantasy leagues, the estimates offer a straightforward comparison of expected production across positions. McDavid leads the forward list, while Makar, Bouchard and Hughes set the pace among defencemen. Managers in category-based formats should note that points projections alone do not account for peripheral categories.

Mini Q&A

Who is projected to lead forwards in points for 2026-27?

Connor McDavid (EDM) is projected to lead forwards with 135 points.

Which defenceman tops the projections?

Cale Makar (COL) tops the defencemen list with 87 projected points.

Are these projections for a full season?

Yes. The projections are quantified for an 84-game season.

Do these numbers represent each player’s ceiling?

No. The projections are described as safe point estimates and do not indicate a player’s ceiling or floor.

Are any injuries or absences highlighted?

Yes. Reportedly, key injuries/absences including Seth Jarvis, Troy Terry, Kevin Fiala and Owen Tippett; Connor Bedard is shown are (INJ.) next to his 81-point projection.

Coach Mark Comment

For points-only drafting, projected power-play usage and expected line combinations are important context behind the totals. Treat these figures as a starting point, then monitor injury status and deployment through pre-season.

IHM Final View

Use the numbers as a drafting framework – particularly in points-only formats – while retaining awareness that injuries, role changes and in-season regression or breakout performances will reshape the leaderboard once games begin.

Jets fantasy preview: Hellebuyck, Connor and Scheifele lead the way

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

A fantasy preview of the Winnipeg Jets ranks Connor Hellebuyck, Kyle Connor, Mark Scheifele, Gabriel Vilardi and Josh Morrissey as the club’s top five options in standard leagues for 2026-27. The projections call for 32 wins from Hellebuyck, with Connor, Scheifele, Vilardi and Morrissey projected for 93, 92, 71 and 59 points respectively.

Key Facts

  • The fantasy preview focuses on the Winnipeg Jets for the 2026-27 season.
  • Top five Jets, in order: Connor Hellebuyck (G), Kyle Connor (F), Mark Scheifele (F), Gabriel Vilardi (F), Josh Morrissey (D).
  • Connor Hellebuyck is projected to win 32 games in 2026-27.
  • Hellebuyck had 23 wins in 57 games last season, a career-low.895 save percentage and zero shutouts for the first time in his career.
  • Hellebuyck won the Hart and Vezina Trophies in 2024-25 after posting career highs: 47 wins, 2.00 GAA, .925 save percentage and eight shutouts.
  • Among goalies with at least 125 games since 2022-23, Hellebuyck leads the NHL in wins (144 in 244 games), save percentage (.916) and goals-against average (2.43); he ranks second in shutouts (17) and saves (6,387).
  • Kyle Connor is projected for 93 points after recording 92 points – 39 goals and 53 assists – in 82 games last season.
  • Mark Scheifele is projected for 92 points after setting career highs last season with 103 points and 67 assists in 82 games, alongside 36 goals.

IHM Discussion

The ranking paints a clear fantasy picture: Winnipeg’s top value rests with its forward depth and an established goaltender whose recent dip could be temporary. Connor and Scheifele remain the offence’s anchor – their involvement on 65 of the same goals last season points to a highly productive on-ice connection. Connor’s sustained shot volume and consistent goal totals make him a reliable fantasy pick, while Scheifele’s 103-point season and regular 30-plus-goal production keep him close behind.

Gabriel Vilardi emerges as a supporting forward with upside. His across-the-board career highs last season – in goals, points, power-play production and shots – came alongside increased ice time and greater exposure to Connor and Scheifele at 5-on-5 and on the power play. That combination can raise a player’s ceiling in standard fantasy formats.

On defence, Josh Morrissey’s profile is that of a steady, heavily used defenceman. His 55 points in 77 games, five straight seasons with at least 100 blocked shots and career-high average ice time of 24:43 underline both offensive contribution and workload. He is viewed as a fringe top-25 fantasy defenceman with the potential to finish inside the top 20.

Goaltending is the headline uncertainty. Hellebuyck’s numbers since 2022-23 remain outstanding, but last season’s results were below his usual level. A 32-win projection reflects bounce-back potential, while his publicly stated desire for a trade remains a factor for fantasy managers to monitor.

Why It Matters

For fantasy managers, the preview separates dependable high-end options from bounce-back plays. Connor and Scheifele offer scoring consistency and proven chemistry, while Vilardi brings upside through his power-play role. Morrissey provides points and peripheral production from defence. Hellebuyck remains a high-ceiling goaltender, but his return to form and any movement arising from his trade request could affect his draft outlook. The projections offer a useful points-and-wins framework for pre-season drafts.

Mini Q&A

Is Connor Hellebuyck still a top fantasy goalie?

He carries bounce-back potential after a down season and is projected for 32 wins in 2026-27. His numbers since 2022-23 remain among the NHL’s best, although he has publicly expressed a desire to be traded.

How valuable are Kyle Connor and Mark Scheifele together?

They were highly productive together: Connor and Scheifele factored on the same goal 65 times last season, the most among teammate duos. They are projected for 93 and 92 points respectively.

Which Jets player is identified as a breakout candidate?

Cole Perfetti is identified as the breakout candidate and is projected for 55 points. Vilardi is projected for 71 points after setting career highs across several major offensive categories last season.

Is Josh Morrissey worth drafting as a fantasy defenceman?

Morrissey is viewed as a fringe top-25 fantasy defenceman with upside to finish inside the top 20 after a 55-point season and career-high average ice time of 24:43.

Any other Jets to consider in drafts?

Cole Perfetti is listed as a breakout candidate at 55 projected points, Vladislav Namestnikov as a bounce-back candidate at 40, and Neal Pionk as a hits-and-blocks specialist at 35.

Coach Mark Comment

Connor and Scheifele’s shared production points to a combination that can continue to drive Winnipeg’s attack. Vilardi’s growth in power-play output and ice time also makes his usage worth watching, while Morrissey’s heavy workload remains central to his fantasy value.

What Comes Next

The 2026-27 regular season will be the primary checkpoint for these projections: whether Hellebuyck rebounds to approach the form that produced his 2024-25 Hart and Vezina seasons, whether Connor and Scheifele maintain their elite connection and point production, and whether Vilardi sustains his expanded role and power-play scoring.

IHM Final View

The rankings place Winnipeg’s fantasy strength in its leading forwards, with Vilardi and Morrissey adding useful upside and stability. Connor and Scheifele’s production together is the club’s clearest fantasy asset. Hellebuyck retains bounce-back potential, though last season’s numbers and his stated desire for a trade add uncertainty for draft decisions.

IHM NHL Rumors: Hellebuyck holdout speculation and eight potential landing spots

Hellebuyck holdout speculation and eight potential landing spots

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck has been linked with the possibility of sitting out if he is not traded before the 2026-27 season. Dave Feschuk said a player who does not report to camp could be suspended without pay, while Marty Biron suggested Hellebuyck might be prepared to sit out for a year. Eight potential destinations have also been identified: Buffalo, New Jersey, Edmonton, Detroit, Vegas, Florida, San Jose and Chicago.

Key Facts

  • Connor Hellebuyck is identified as a Winnipeg Jets goaltender; the image caption lists him as 33.
  • Dave Feschuk said that a player who does not attend camp can be suspended without pay.
  • Marty Biron suggested Hellebuyck might be willing to accept a suspension and sit out for a year, though this is not confirmation that he will do so.
  • Eight teams were identified as possible clubs with some level of interest in Hellebuyck.
  • The eight teams mentioned as potential landing spots are: Buffalo Sabres, New Jersey Devils, Edmonton Oilers, Detroit Red Wings, Vegas Golden Knights, Florida Panthers, San Jose Sharks, and Chicago Blackhawks.
  • The Bleacher Report breakdown for Buffalo suggested the Sabres could offer goalies Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen, Alex Lyon or Colten Ellis; a young forward such as Konsta Helenius, Noah Östlund or Zach Benson; a prospect like Radim Mrtka, Adam Kleber or Daxon Rudolph; or a roster player like Jack Quinn or Josh Norris.
  • For New Jersey, Bleacher Report suggested the Devils could include Dawson Mercer or Arseny Gritsyuk, prospects Lenni Hämeenaho, Seamus Casey or Anton Silayev, and goaltender Nico Daws.
  • Edmonton was listed as a team that would “love a goalie like Hellebuyck” but the report called such a deal unlikely to put together.
  • Edmonton was described as a club that would welcome a goaltender such as Hellebuyck, but as an unlikely trade to complete.
  • Detroit was identified as a possible destination. Trey Augustine and other young NHL players were mentioned as potential trade pieces.
  • Vegas was noted as a club facing possible waiver and salary-cap complications, with Adin Hill and Carter Hart raised as potential considerations.
  • San Jose may have young prospects of interest, including Yaroslav Askarov, though the Sharks were described as unlikely to move Michael Misa, Ivar Stenberg or Sam Dickinson. Chicago was suggested as a possible fit with Spencer Knight as an ideal replacement, and prospects such as Oliver Moore, Roman Kantserov, Kevin Korchinski and Sam Rinzel mentioned as potential pieces to interest Winnipeg.

IHM Discussion

The discussion has two strands: whether Hellebuyck would sit out if Winnipeg cannot complete a trade, and which clubs could assemble a credible offer. Feschuk outlined the potential consequence of a player not reporting to camp: suspension without pay. Biron went further, offering his view that Hellebuyck could be willing to step away for a season. That remains opinion rather than an indication from the goaltender himself.

Why It Matters

A prolonged absence by an established starting goaltender would leave Winnipeg with a major roster decision, while a trade would require another club to meet the Jets’ asking price. The range of teams identified reflects how differently clubs may value a proven starter, but no deal or preferred destination has been confirmed.

IHM Market Outlook

The eight-team list presents several different trade scenarios rather than one clear frontrunner. Buffalo and New Jersey were linked with a range of young players, prospects and goaltending options. Edmonton was described as an unlikely deal to complete, while Vegas faces potential salary and waiver complications. Florida’s recent acquisition of Jacob Markström was also identified as a barrier. San Jose and Chicago were linked with young talent, although limits were noted on the pieces they might be willing to move. These are proposed scenarios, not reported negotiations or offers.

Mini Q&A

Is it confirmed that Connor Hellebuyck will sit out if not traded?

No. Marty Biron suggested Hellebuyck might be willing to sit out, but there is no confirmation that he will refuse to report to camp.

Can the Jets withhold pay if a player refuses to attend camp?

Dave Feschuk said that a team can suspend a player who does not report to camp and would not pay that player while suspended.

Which teams were named as potential Hellebuyck destinations?

The eight teams identified as potential destinations were Buffalo, New Jersey, Edmonton, Detroit, Vegas, Florida, San Jose and Chicago.

Are there specific assets mentioned that Winnipeg might get in return?

Yes. Possible returns included Buffalo goaltenders Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen, Alex Lyon or Colten Ellis, and young forwards such as Konsta Helenius, Noah Östlund or Zach Benson. Dawson Mercer and Arseny Gritsyuk were among the New Jersey players mentioned, while Spencer Knight was raised as a possible Chicago replacement. These were hypothetical possibilities, not confirmed offers.

What would provide clarity on the situation?

Clarity would come from Hellebuyck’s decision on reporting to camp or from a trade agreement. Neither has been confirmed.

Coach Mark Comment

A goaltending change of this scale affects far more than the crease. Winnipeg would need clarity on its available options before setting its early-season plan, while any acquiring club would have to establish how a new starter fits alongside its existing goaltenders. Until there is a transaction or a reporting decision, those questions remain hypothetical.

IHM Final View

There is no confirmed holdout, trade or destination for Hellebuyck. The possibility of a suspension was raised in commentary, while the eight-team list outlines potential fits and possible trade components rather than active negotiations. The key development will be whether Hellebuyck reports to camp and whether Winnipeg finds a deal it is prepared to make.

Five NHL Players Unlucky in the 2025-26 Season

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

Five NHL players posted results that lagged behind their underlying numbers in 2025-26. Nico Hischier, Brandon Tanev, Tomas Hertl, William Eklund and Anders Lee each had a case for better fortune, whether through missed finishing, poor on-ice goaltending or both. They enter the new season looking for a rebound.

Key Facts

  • List derived from Evolving Hockey data and restricted to players with at least 500 total minutes of ice time.
  • Nico Hischier (centre, New Jersey Devils) scored 28 goals against 35.1 expected goals. New Jersey scored 52% of goals with him on the ice, while his on-ice goals-for percentage was more than five percentage points below his expected-goals-for percentage. His linemates failed to convert nearly 34 expected goals with him on the ice, and New Jersey’s goaltending struggled behind him.
  • Brandon Tanev (left wing, Utah Mammoth) missed time with injury and played 56 games, recording just three assists; he generated 5.3 expected goals but scored zero goals; when on the ice Utah was outscored 25-9 but expected goals suggested a closer margin of about 25-20; his personal shooting percentage was 0.0; his linemates produced a combined shooting percentage of 4.9%, the lowest in the league; his on-ice save percentage was.885 and his PDO was 93.4, with only six players lower.
  • Tanev’s career totals entering that season were 84 goals in 608 NHL games, emphasising his usual role as a depth, non-primary offensive option.
  • Tomas Hertl (centre, Vegas Golden Knights) scored 24 goals in 2025-26 after scoring 32 goals in nine fewer games the previous season; his shooting percentage last season was 11.8% versus a career mark of 13.9%; he generated 39.1 expected goals, scoring 15 fewer goals than expected; Vegas goalies posted a combined.843 save percentage behind him.
  • William Eklund (left wing, traded from San Jose Sharks to Ottawa Senators) had the sixth-lowest on-ice save percentage in the league at .840 over roughly 1,446 minutes; Sharks goalies allowed about 14 more goals than expected when he was on the ice; Eklund recorded 15 goals and 38 assists for 53 points while scoring those 15 goals on more than 25 expected goals; his on-ice result was 89 goals for on 99.1 expected goals, a shortfall of 10 goals; his shooting percentage was 8.5% versus a career average of 11.5%.
  • The five players were characterised as heading into the upcoming season hoping for better bounces and potential rebounds from poor on-ice luck, whether through shooting variance or goaltending behind them.

IHM Discussion

The common thread across this group is the gap between chance quality and the final scoreline. Hischier, Hertl, Eklund, Tanev and Lee all had evidence of results falling short of the opportunity or on-ice environment around them. Tanev and Lee endured particularly stark finishing shortfalls, while Eklund’s on-ice results were also weighed down by San Jose’s goaltending. The figures point to variance as a meaningful part of the picture, though they cannot by themselves rule out longer-term change.

Why It Matters

These disparities matter because expected-goals metrics are widely used to separate true performance from luck. When a player’s underlying numbers remain strong despite poor results, it suggests upside – either through personal regression toward career norms or improved team defensive support. Conversely, persistent discrepancies can conceal larger roster or goaltending problems that limit a team’s ability to convert individual performance into wins. For clubs and fans, recognising which players were unlucky helps set realistic expectations for recovery and roster decisions ahead of the next season.

Mini Q&A

Who are the five players identified as the unluckiest in 2025-26?

Nico Hischier, Brandon Tanev, Tomas Hertl, William Eklund and Anders Lee.

Which player had the largest shortfall between expected goals and actual goals?

Anders Lee had 41.9 expected goals but only 19 actual goals; several others also scored well below their xG totals, such as Nico Hischier (28 goals on 35.1 xG) and Tomas Hertl (24 goals on 39.1 xG).

Which player recorded a 0.0 personal shooting percentage in 2025-26?

Brandon Tanev recorded a 0.0 personal shooting percentage while playing 56 games that season.

What role did team goaltending play in these cases?

Poor goaltending amplified misfortune for several players: New Jersey’s goaltending was described as abysmal behind Nico Hischier; Vegas goalies posted a .843 save percentage behind Tomas Hertl; and San Jose goalies allowed about 14 more goals than expected when William Eklund was on the ice, corresponding to an on-ice save percentage of.840 for Eklund.

Coach Mark Comment

The practical coaching response is to keep players getting to productive areas rather than chasing low-percentage offence. For Hertl and Lee, the priority is sustaining shot volume and net-front presence; for Hischier and Eklund, stronger team defending can limit the damage when on-ice save percentage drops. The underlying numbers suggest there is no need to abandon the habits that created those chances.

What Comes Next

All five players head into the upcoming season hoping for better bounces and statistical regression in their favour.

IHM Final View

This ranking highlights measurable misfortune rather than proving decline. For Hischier, Hertl, Eklund, Tanev and Lee, a shooting rebound, better on-ice goaltending or both could make the next season look markedly different.

IHM NHL Rumors: Four NHL teams discussed as potential Connor Hellebuyck fits

Four NHL teams discussed as potential Connor Hellebuyck fits

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck has told the club he wants a change, prompting discussion about possible destinations. The Jets released a statement from general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff saying Hellebuyck has been open about his desire for a change and that the organisation is working through the situation, with no update at this time.

Florida was also raised during the conversation as a possible destination.

Key Facts

  • The Winnipeg Jets said Connor Hellebuyck has been open with the club about his desire for a change.
  • The Jets released a statement attributed to Kevin Cheveldayoff: ‘Connor has been open with us about his desire for a change. He has been an important part of the Winnipeg Jets organization for many years, and we have tremendous respect for what he has accomplished here. While we continue to work through the situation in a thoughtful manner, there is no update at this time.’
  • Florida was also mentioned during the discussion.
  • Mike Rupp said a public stance from Hellebuyck could affect Winnipeg’s leverage in any potential move.
  • Mike Johnson said Winnipeg would probably need a goaltender with term in any return, and pointed to Buffalo’s young players as assets that could fit the Jets’ needs.
  • Mike Johnson said an $8.5 million figure would not necessarily be excessive for a goaltender of Hellebuyck’s calibre and suggested Carolina could make sense.
  • Panel commentary suggested Utah could be an appealing market for an established No. 1 goaltender and that New Jersey could be interested despite cap and asset considerations.
  • There is no confirmation of offers, an asking price, timing or a completed trade.

IHM Discussion

The Jets’ statement takes the matter beyond ordinary speculation: Hellebuyck has told the club he wants a change, although Winnipeg has announced no transaction. Florida came up during the conversation as another possibility.

The panel’s focus was on the challenge of any return. Johnson suggested Winnipeg would probably need a goaltender with term coming back, while Buffalo was highlighted for its young players. Rupp’s view was that a public stance from Hellebuyck could limit the Jets’ leverage, but no offers or negotiations were confirmed.

Why It Matters

Any move involving Hellebuyck would be significant for Winnipeg and for a club seeking greater certainty in goal. The discussion centred on teams with different roster and cap considerations, while the eventual return would shape the Jets’ next steps. For now, the only official update is that Winnipeg is working through the situation.

IHM Market Outlook

Any potential deal would have to account for cap space, term and the return Winnipeg seeks. Johnson suggested the Jets would probably want either a goaltender with term or young players under team control, and Buffalo was discussed in that context.

Mini Q&A

Has Connor Hellebuyck said he wants to leave Winnipeg?

The Jets said Hellebuyck has been open with them about his desire for a change. Kevin Cheveldayoff added that the club is working through the situation and has no update at this time.

Which teams were named as possible fits in the discussion?

Commentators also suggested the Florida Panthers as a potential destination.

Could Hellebuyck’s stance affect Winnipeg’s return?

Mike Rupp said it could affect Winnipeg’s leverage in a potential move. No offers or return values have been confirmed.

What kind of players might Winnipeg seek in return?

Mike Johnson suggested Winnipeg would probably want young players under team control or a goaltender with term coming back. He cited Buffalo’s young players as examples of the type of assets that could fit that profile.

Is there an official update on a trade from the Jets?

No. The Jets’ statement from Kevin Cheveldayoff said they continue to ‘work through the situation in a thoughtful manner’ and that there is ‘no update at this time.’

Coach Mark Comment

For any acquiring team, the fit would depend on more than the goaltender alone. Defensive detail, puck management and the ability to limit second chances all help a starter settle into a new environment. The proposed destinations differ in roster construction, so the price and the support in front of him would matter as much as the name on the jersey.

IHM Final View

Winnipeg has confirmed that Hellebuyck wants a change, but it has provided no update on a potential transaction. Buffalo, Carolina, Utah and New Jersey were among the teams discussed, with Florida also mentioned. There is no confirmation of offers, an asking price or a timeline.

IHM NHL Rumors: Dylan Larkin to Canadiens makes sense – but would he go?

Dylan Larkin to Canadiens makes sense – but would he go?

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

A panel discussion suggested a trade sending Detroit Red Wings centre Dylan Larkin to the Montreal Canadiens could make sense for both clubs. The panel argued Montreal could assemble a strong package of prospects and that Larkin would strengthen an already talented group. It also noted that Larkin would have a say in any move, with Montreal reportedly not among four teams on his list.

Key Facts

  • The discussion considered whether the Montreal Canadiens could acquire Dylan Larkin from the Detroit Red Wings.
  • Panelists suggested the Montreal Canadiens could put together a strong trade package to acquire Larkin.
  • One panellist suggested Detroit could prefer to resolve any Larkin trade sooner rather than later.
  • One panellist said Larkin had provided four teams and that Montreal was reportedly not among them.
  • Mike Rupp said that landing Larkin would retroactively make Kent Hughes ‘GM of the year’ because of Montreal’s position ‘salary cap wise, talent wise, future wise.’
  • Panelists suggested Montreal could include University of Michigan prospect Michael Hage, described as a first-rounder, among the pieces sent to Detroit.
  • Hosts discussed current Canadiens forwards Nick Suzuki, Slafkovsky and Cole Caufield as a top line and imagined Larkin forming a potent second line with Matvei Demidov.
  • The panel discussed whether Montreal could seek permission from Detroit to speak with Larkin and outline the appeal of playing for the Canadiens.

IHM Discussion

The panel framed Larkin-to-Montreal as a strong roster fit, arguing that the Canadiens have both forward depth and a prospect pipeline that could appeal to Detroit. It suggested Montreal could offer help for the Red Wings while also presenting itself as an attractive destination for a player seeking to contend.

There are clear practical hurdles. One panellist said Larkin would have a say in his destination and that Montreal was reportedly not among four teams he had provided. The panel also floated Michael Hage as a possible element of a package, while suggesting Montreal could build an offer largely around futures. Those ideas remain speculation, rather than evidence of a negotiation.

Why It Matters

If Montreal acquired Larkin, the panel argued that it could strengthen the Canadiens’ top six without breaking up the Suzuki, Slafkovsky and Caufield line. It imagined Larkin alongside Matvei Demidov on a second line. For Detroit, such a move could bring back multiple assets, potentially including a prospect such as Michael Hage. Any scenario, however, depends on Detroit’s willingness to move Larkin and on Larkin’s own destination preferences.

IHM Market Outlook

The panel viewed Montreal as well positioned because of its prospect depth, contracts and potential to contend in the coming years. It argued that those factors could make the Canadiens an appealing landing spot for Larkin, but player preference remains a significant constraint in any potential move.

Mini Q&A

Is the report a confirmed trade?

No. The discussion presented a Montreal trade as a possibility, not a completed or confirmed transaction.

Would Montreal be able to make a competitive offer?

The panel suggested Montreal could assemble a strong prospect package and mentioned University of Michigan prospect Michael Hage as one possible piece.

Does Dylan Larkin have control over a move?

The panel said Larkin had provided four teams and that Montreal was reportedly not among them, indicating that he would have a say in any destination.

Why do the panelists think Montreal is an attractive destination?

They argued Montreal is ‘stacked’ for several years, with a core that could compete for the Stanley Cup and a forward group that could accommodate Larkin, especially alongside players such as Nick Suzuki, Slafkovsky and Cole Caufield.

What is the main obstacle to the trade?

Larkin’s destination preferences are a major hurdle, particularly as Montreal was reportedly not among four teams on his list. Detroit would also need to be willing to make a trade.

Coach Mark Comment

Larkin would give Montreal another established option down the middle and could improve the balance of its top six. If Suzuki, Slafkovsky and Caufield remained together, a Larkin-Demidov combination would offer a different look on a second line. Any new alignment would need clear roles at five-on-five, on special teams and in key face-off situations.

IHM Final View

The suggestion that Montreal could trade for Dylan Larkin is an intriguing scenario, not a confirmed deal. Detroit’s appetite for a trade and Larkin’s ability to influence his destination remain the central questions. Montreal was reportedly not among four teams on his list, leaving any move firmly unproven.

Evander Kane responds to Kurtis Gabriel criticism

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

Evander Kane has publicly responded to criticism from former San Jose Sharks teammate Kurtis Gabriel, warning on social media that he may reveal his own version of events backed by ” facts, receipts and the actual truth.” Gabriel had earlier described Kane as a ” terrible teammate” who caused ” massive issues” in the Sharks’ 2020-21 locker room. Kane, 35, is currently without an NHL contract and has previously played for Edmonton and Vancouver since leaving San Jose; several KHL clubs have been reported to have interest in him.

Key Facts

  • Evander Kane posted on social media on 31 August 2026 that he plans to share his ” truths,” saying they will ” come with facts, receipts, and the actual truth.”
  • Kane wrote that many people have become comfortable speaking publicly while relying on his silence and added: ” Enjoy it while it lasts.”
  • Kurtis Gabriel criticised Kane earlier on a podcast, calling him ” a terrible teammate” and saying he caused ” massive issues” in the San Jose Sharks locker room during the 2020-21 season.
  • Gabriel said the Sharks previously had a good locker-room atmosphere and that GM Doug Wilson believed the team could handle Kane, but that ” you cannot handle pure narcissism that comes from insecurity.”
  • Kane was the San Jose Sharks’ leading scorer in the 2020-21 season.
  • San Jose terminated Kane’s contract during the 2021-22 season.
  • After leaving San Jose, Kane played for the Edmonton Oilers and, most recently, the Vancouver Canucks.
  • Several KHL teams have reportedly shown interest in Kane.

IHM Discussion

The exchange has returned attention to the Sharks’ 2020-21 season. Gabriel offered a severe assessment of Kane’s impact in the dressing room, while Kane indicated that he intends to challenge accounts of that period with his own evidence. For now, the public dispute remains an exchange of competing claims.

Why It Matters

Kane is currently without an NHL contract, and the exchange puts renewed attention on his time in San Jose. Any further statement from Kane could add to the public discussion around the 2020-21 Sharks season.

Mini Q&A

What did Evander Kane say in response to Kurtis Gabriel?

Kane wrote on social media that he intends to share his ” truths,” saying they will include ” facts, receipts, and the actual truth,” and warned that many people had grown comfortable speaking while relying on his silence.

What criticism did Kurtis Gabriel make about Kane?

Gabriel called Kane ” a terrible teammate,” said he caused ” massive issues” in the San Jose Sharks locker room during 2020-21, and criticised the idea that the team could manage what he described as ” pure narcissism that comes from insecurity.”

When did Kane post his message?

Kane’s post was dated 31 August 2026.

What is Kane’s contract status and recent playing history?

Kane is reported to be 35 years old and currently without an NHL contract. He was San Jose’s leading scorer in 2020-21, had his contract in San Jose terminated during 2021-22, then played for Edmonton and most recently Vancouver.

Coach Mark Comment

A dressing room relies on clear standards and direct communication. Public disputes can keep old tensions in view, but the available comments do not establish the full picture of what happened inside the Sharks’ room.

What Comes Next

Kane said he would share his version of events “when the time is right”, but gave no timetable for a further statement.

IHM Final View

For now, Gabriel’s criticism and Kane’s response amount to competing public accounts of the 2020-21 Sharks season. Kane has indicated that he may say more, but no timetable has been given.

Evan Solomon visits Roustan hockey factory over tariffs

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Minister Evan Solomon visited the Roustan Hockey factory in Brantford, Ont., to discuss the effect of recently imposed tariffs on ice hockey equipment. W. Graeme Roustan issued a statement after Monday’s visit, citing challenges for manufacturers and reaffirming the company’s commitment to its Canadian operations.

The factory produces around 400,000 traditional wood sticks a year, with nearly half sold in the United States. The U.S. tariffs took effect on Aug. 22. On Aug. 25, the Canadian government announced matching countermeasures and a $7.5-billion support package for affected workers and businesses; Solomon is among the ministers co-leading the measures.

Key Facts

  • Evan Solomon is the Canadian Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Minister who visited the Roustan Hockey factory.
  • W. Graeme Roustan issued a statement following Monday’s visit with Solomon.
  • Roustan said: ” The current trade environment is creating challenges for manufacturers across Canada.”
  • Roustan added: ” Despite these challenges, we remain committed to our employees, our customers and our manufacturing operations here in Canada.”
  • The Roustan Hockey factory is located in Brantford, Ont., and is the only hockey-stick manufacturer based in Canada.
  • The company produces around 400,000 traditional wood sticks per year.
  • Nearly half of Roustan’s annual stick production is sold in the United States.
  • U.S. President Donald Trump announced an additional 50 percent tariff on a wide range of imports from Canada, including ice hockey equipment; those tariffs took effect on Aug. 22.
  • The Canadian government announced on Aug. 25 that it would match the new U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar and introduce additional Canadian tariffs on U.S. goods.
  • Ottawa also announced a $7.5-billion package of relief funds to support Canadian workers and businesses impacted by the tariffs.
  • The Canadian countermeasures and relief package are co-led by Minister Solomon among other financial ministers.
  • Roustan welcomed the national tariff relief measures and Canada’s promise to help protect businesses and jobs, writing that the support is needed to ” ensure world-leading, Canadian-owned companies like ours continue to invest, grow and manufacture in Canada for years to come.”

IHM Discussion

The visit came as the U.S. tariff measures explicitly include ice hockey equipment. Roustan Hockey produces about 400,000 traditional wood sticks each year, with nearly half sold in the United States, leaving a substantial part of its business exposed to the cross-border trade measures.

Roustan described the trade environment as challenging for manufacturers across Canada, while thanking customers on both sides of the border and restating the company’s commitment to its employees, customers and Canadian manufacturing operations.

Canada’s response combines matching tariffs with a $7.5-billion relief package for affected workers and businesses. Solomon is among the ministers co-leading those measures. For Roustan, the practical significance will depend on how the tariffs and support measures affect its ability to continue manufacturing and selling into its established markets.

Why It Matters

Roustan is Canada’s only stick manufacturer and sells nearly half of its annual output in the United States. The new tariff environment therefore has direct importance for a Canadian hockey-equipment maker with significant cross-border sales.

The government’s relief package is intended to support workers and businesses affected by the tariffs. Roustan has welcomed the measures, saying support will be needed for Canadian-owned manufacturers to continue investing, growing and producing in Canada.

IHM Market Outlook

The immediate outlook is uncertain for manufacturers trading across the Canada-U.S. border. The U.S. tariff applies to hockey equipment, while Canada has announced matching countermeasures and relief funding for affected workers and businesses.

For Roustan Hockey, which sells nearly half of its traditional wood-stick output in the United States, the durability of the tariffs and the detail of available support will be important factors in the months ahead.

Mini Q&A

Who visited the Roustan Hockey factory?

Evan Solomon, Canada’s Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Minister, visited the Roustan Hockey factory in Brantford, Ont.

Why did the minister visit Roustan?

The visit addressed concerns arising from newly imposed tariffs on ice hockey equipment and their potential impact on Canadian manufacturers such as Roustan.

How many sticks does Roustan produce and where are they sold?

Roustan produces around 400,000 traditional wooden sticks each year, with nearly half sold in the United States.

What trade measures have affected hockey equipment?

The U.S. imposed a 50 percent tariff on a wide range of Canadian imports including ice hockey equipment that took effect on Aug. 22; Canada announced matching tariffs and a $7.5-billion relief package on Aug. 25.

Coach Mark Comment

Reliable access to familiar equipment matters at every level of the game, particularly for players who prefer traditional wood sticks. Any sustained disruption to cross-border supply or pricing would be most manageable when clubs, retailers and players communicate early about availability and alternatives.

IHM Final View

Solomon’s visit put a public focus on the pressure facing Roustan Hockey as tariffs begin to affect hockey equipment trade. With nearly half of its annual stick production sold in the United States, the company has a clear interest in how the measures develop. Canada’s countermeasures and relief package offer support for affected businesses and workers, but Roustan’s statement underlined the importance of maintaining Canadian manufacturing.

IHM NHL Rumors: New York Islanders enter 2026-27 with quiet off-season

New York Islanders enter 2026-27 with quiet off-season

By IceHockeyMan Editorial Team | Published:

Story Summary

The New York Islanders head into the 2026-27 season with a roster that looks familiar. Peter DeBoer arrived as head coach on April 5 with four regular-season games remaining, and the club made a handful of low-risk signings on July 1 – Matias Maccelli, Mitchell Chaffee, Vitek Vanecek, Matthew Kessel – plus Ryan Healey in a separate one-year deal. Longtime captain Anders Lee left in free agency, signing a three-year deal with Utah worth a reported $5.4 million AAV.

Key Facts

  • Peter DeBoer was hired as New York Islanders head coach on April 5, 2026, with four games remaining in the 2025-26 season.
  • Matias Maccelli (LW) signed a one-year deal on July 1, 2026; he had 14 goals and 39 points in 71 games last season with Toronto.
  • Mitchell Chaffee (RW) signed a one-year deal on July 1, 2026, adding bottom-six physicality.
  • Vitek Vanecek (G) signed a one-year deal on July 1, 2026, expected to provide goaltending depth behind Ilya Sorokin and Semyon Varlamov as a third option.
  • Matthew Kessel (D) signed a one-year deal on July 1, 2026, a 26-year-old right-shot defenceman expected to provide depth and two-way play.
  • Ryan Healey (D), a 25-year-old left-shot defenceman, signed a one-year deal; expected to compete for call-up depth.
  • Anders Lee (LW), the Islanders’ longtime captain, signed a three-year deal with Utah on July 1, 2026, with a reported $5.4 million AAV.
  • Depth departures included David Rittich, Carson Soucy, Maxim Shabanov, Adam Boqvist, Marc Gatcomb, Marcus Hogberg, Cole McWard and Travis Mitchell.
  • The preview describes DeBoer as likely to implement a more defensive-minded system.
  • The source projects the Islanders’ cap hit at $101,065,416 with a 23/23 roster, projected cap space of $2,934,584 and deadline cap space of $13,554,983.
  • the assessment: additions add depth and a scoring middle-six element, but the loss of Lee and a quiet off-season make a playoff push improbable.

IHM Discussion

The Islanders’ summer looks deliberate and conservative. The July 1 one-year additions (Matias Maccelli, Mitchell Chaffee, Vitek Vanecek and Matthew Kessel) are the sorts of low-commitment signings that add depth and hedge risk rather than transform a club.

Matias Maccelli’s arrival is the clearest short-term upgrade up front. His 14 goals and 39 points in 71 games last season suggest he can add middle-six scoring and pace, qualities DeBoer can use if he wants to generate offence off a compact defensive base. Mitchell Chaffee and the defensive depth signings (Kessel, Healey) point to a roster-building approach focused on competitive minutes from cheaper veterans and call-up-ready options.

Goaltending remains anchored by Ilya Sorokin and Semyon Varlamov; adding Vitek Vanecek as a third option is a precautionary depth move rather than a statement about the starter tandem. The loss of Anders Lee, both as a physical presence and locker-room leader, is meaningful; the preview explicitly links that departure to a decline in veteran leadership and middle-six scoring. That combination – a coaching change plus modest roster churn and the exit of a long-serving captain – helps explain the source’s overall scepticism about a playoff push.

Cap figures matter here. The projection of roughly $2.9m projected cap space in the near term constrains the Islanders should they identify a trade target or in-season need.

Why It Matters

This is an important season for the Islanders’ short-term direction. DeBoer arrives with a defensive pedigree, while the roster changes are modest. The departure of Anders Lee removes an experienced winger who supplied goals and leadership, placing greater importance on the club’s returning core and its new middle-six additions.

IHM Market Outlook

The preview projects a $101,065,416 cap hit, $2,934,584 in cap space and a full 23-man roster. That leaves limited room for immediate additions without moving salary. Projected deadline cap space of $13,554,983 could provide greater flexibility later in the season, while the one-year additions keep the club’s commitments short term.

Mini Q&A

Who is the Islanders’ new head coach and when was he hired?

Peter DeBoer was hired as head coach on April 5, 2026, with four regular-season games remaining in the 2025-26 season.

Which notable players did the Islanders sign on July 1, 2026?

On July 1, 2026 the Islanders signed Matias Maccelli (LW), Mitchell Chaffee (RW), Vitek Vanecek (G) and Matthew Kessel (D) to one-year deals.

What important departure did the Islanders face in free agency?

Longtime captain Anders Lee left in free agency, signing a three-year deal with Utah at a reported $5.4 million AAV on July 1, 2026.

What is the Islanders’ projected cap situation in the preview?

The source projects a team cap hit of $101,065,416, a 23/23 roster, projected cap space of $2,934,584 and deadline cap space of $13,554,983.

Which prospects are listed as top Islanders prospects in the source?

Prospects highlighted include Victor Eklund, Malte Gustafsson, Kashawn Aitcheson and Cole Eiserman, among others.

Coach Mark Comment

DeBoer’s late arrival and a more defensive-minded structure make role clarity and consistent execution central to the Islanders’ start. Maccelli gives the middle six added pace and scoring potential, while the loss of Lee leaves a vacancy in the club’s physical, net-front presence. The depth signings give the coaching staff more options, but they do not by themselves change the team’s overall outlook.

IHM Final View

The Islanders’ off-season was conservative: an experienced coach arrived, several short-term depth signings were made and a longtime captain departed. The preview’s conclusion is clear: New York faces an uphill battle to make the playoffs in 2026-27. The cap position and one-year additions suggest a club retaining flexibility rather than making a major immediate commitment.