By Coach Mark Lehtonen | IceHockeyMan
30 October 2026
For more than four years, international ice hockey has been missing one of its historic competitors. On 30 October 2026, that situation took a significant turn.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) overturned the International Ice Hockey Federation’s decision to exclude Russian national teams from major championships during the 2026/27 season.
For millions of hockey supporters, this is an extraordinary development.
For players, coaches and national hockey programmes, it could mark the beginning of a very different future.
And for me, as someone who has spent years studying this game from a coaching perspective, the ruling raises a question that goes far beyond Russia.
How much politics should we allow into a sport that has always had the power to bring people together?
I have my own answer.
I do not believe hockey should become a battlefield for political disagreements.
I do not believe young athletes should automatically lose their sporting opportunities because of decisions they did not make.
And I do not believe that refusing to acknowledge an entire country’s hockey culture makes our sport stronger.
From a sporting perspective, I welcome the possibility of Russia returning to international competition.
But I also understand that this is not a simple situation. The war in Ukraine has caused enormous suffering, and the concerns of Ukrainian athletes and other national federations deserve serious consideration.
We need to be able to recognise those realities while still having an honest conversation about the future of hockey.
That is what I want to do today.
Hockey Should Bring People Together, Not Divide Them
Let me begin with something I have believed throughout my involvement in this sport.
When I watch a hockey game, I do not begin by thinking about the political positions of the countries represented on the ice.
I watch the players.
I watch how teams defend, how they create scoring opportunities, how their coaches respond under pressure and how individual athletes make decisions in fractions of a second.
I watch a game that requires extraordinary skill, discipline, courage and teamwork.
That is hockey.
And that is the hockey I want future generations to experience.
Of course, international sport has never been completely separated from politics. National teams represent countries, and countries have histories, disagreements and conflicts.
Ignoring that reality would be naive.
But recognising that politics exists is different from accepting that political disagreements should determine every sporting opportunity.
In my view, we should make every reasonable effort to protect the independence of sporting competition.
A hockey player should be judged by what they do on the ice, not automatically by the political decisions of their government.
That principle matters to me.
It matters when we talk about Russia.
It matters when we talk about Ukraine.
And it should matter whenever international events create difficult questions about who can participate.
Sport cannot solve every political disagreement, but it can provide a place where people from different backgrounds compete under shared rules.
I would rather see that opportunity protected wherever it can be protected safely and fairly.
Why Russia’s Return Is Good News for Hockey
From a purely sporting perspective, Russia’s potential return is significant.
Russian hockey has contributed enormously to the development of the international game.
Think about the creativity of its forwards, the technical quality of its players, its traditions of puck possession and the influence of generations of outstanding hockey coaches.
Russian hockey has produced some of the most recognisable names in our sport.
It has influenced coaching philosophy, player development and the way attacking hockey is played.
That history does not disappear because a national team is absent from a tournament.
For many years, games between Russia and Canada, Finland, Sweden, the United States and Czechia were among the most anticipated events in international hockey.
They were not simply games between flags.
They were meetings between different hockey philosophies.
As a coach, that is what always interested me.
What happens when a technically gifted attacking team meets an opponent built around aggressive forechecking?
How does a possession-oriented system respond to a disciplined neutral-zone trap?
Can individual creativity overcome a carefully organised defensive structure?
Those are fascinating questions.
And when strong national programmes compete against one another, everyone has an opportunity to learn.
International hockey becomes more interesting when its strongest available teams can test themselves against one another.
That does not guarantee that Russia would immediately return as a championship favourite.
It would still need to establish a competitive roster, rebuild international team chemistry and adapt to the development of other national programmes.
But having another historically powerful hockey nation involved would add an important sporting dimension to the competition.
That is why I see something genuinely positive in this development.
Being Against Politics in Sport Does Not Mean Ignoring Reality
I want to make one point absolutely clear.
Supporting the opportunity for Russian hockey players to return to international competition is not the same as supporting the decisions of the Russian government.
Those are different things.
The war in Ukraine is real. Its consequences are real. The suffering of families, communities and athletes cannot simply be dismissed because we would like to watch an exciting hockey tournament.
Ukrainian hockey has faced enormous challenges during the war.
Players have had to continue their development under difficult circumstances. Hockey infrastructure has been damaged. Families and sporting communities have been affected.
I have enormous respect for athletes who continue training and competing under such conditions.
That deserves recognition.
At the same time, there are Russian children and young hockey players who have spent years training with the ambition of representing their country internationally.
Many of them have had no influence over the events that led to their exclusion.
For those young players, years without international competition are not simply an administrative inconvenience.
They are years of sporting development that cannot be recovered.
We should be capable of caring about Ukrainian athletes without automatically treating every Russian athlete as responsible for the decisions of their government.
That is not an attempt to equate their circumstances.
It is a recognition that individual athletes have their own lives, ambitions and responsibilities.
There is also a legitimate discussion to be had about safety, security and the responsibilities of sporting organisations.
The IIHF has expressed concerns about those matters, and the CAS ruling does not mean that every practical question has been resolved.
Those concerns must be addressed seriously.
Being opposed to unnecessary political interference in sport does not mean ignoring genuine risks to participants.
It means looking for solutions that are proportionate, fair and based on evidence.
The Young Players Are the Ones I Think About Most
When people discuss international suspensions, they usually talk about famous national teams and established professional players.
But I often think about someone much younger.
Imagine a 15-year-old hockey player who has spent most of their childhood preparing for the possibility of representing their country.
Early mornings at the rink.
Long journeys to training sessions.
Parents making sacrifices to support their child’s development.
Coaches spending years improving the player’s skating, decision-making and understanding of the game.
Then, just as that player reaches an important stage of international development, the opportunity disappears.
Not because the player failed.
Not because the team lost a qualification tournament.
But because circumstances outside the athlete’s control have changed the rules of participation.
I find that difficult from a sporting perspective.
Junior international tournaments are not only about winning medals.
They expose young players to different tactical systems, higher levels of competition and the pressure of representing their national programmes.
That experience can influence an entire career.
It can also influence how those players understand the world.
A young athlete who meets opponents from different countries may discover that the people on the other side of the ice are not so different from themselves.
They train hard.
They make sacrifices.
They want to win.
And they love hockey.
Sometimes sport creates connections that politics cannot.
That possibility should not be underestimated.
IceHockeyMan Has Also Experienced the Consequences of Restrictions
There is another part of this discussion that I want to address personally because it concerns our work at IceHockeyMan.
Our platform was created to cover hockey, explain hockey and help supporters understand the game more deeply.
We have never wanted IceHockeyMan to become a platform defined by political loyalties.
We want to follow the sport wherever meaningful hockey stories are developing.
That includes the NHL, European domestic leagues, international championships, junior hockey and player development.
It also includes Russian hockey.
Yet covering Russian hockey, particularly the Kontinental Hockey League (KHL), has not always been straightforward for us.
During the period of international restrictions, our editorial team also encountered limitations and objections concerning the publication of KHL-related material.
There were occasions when we were told that KHL coverage could not be published.
For a hockey publication whose purpose is to report on the sport, that was a frustrating situation.
We could discuss Russian players competing in the NHL.
We could follow their goals, assists, injuries, contracts and performances.
But covering the hockey being played inside Russia had become a much more complicated issue.
And I have always found that distinction difficult to understand from a purely sporting perspective.
Why should a player’s nationality become a barrier to discussing their hockey ability?
Why should an interesting tactical development become less relevant because it happened in a Russian league?
Why should supporters interested in player development have fewer opportunities to understand what is happening in one part of the hockey world?
I understand that broadcasting rights, sanctions, publishing rules and other legal requirements must be respected.
We will always take those responsibilities seriously.
But factual reporting about hockey is not the same thing as political endorsement.
Describing a great goal does not mean supporting a government. Analysing a hockey system does not mean endorsing a political decision. Reporting a verified player transfer does not mean taking a political side.
For me, that distinction is fundamental to independent sports journalism.
A New Chapter for IceHockeyMan: We Will Cover Russian Hockey
That brings me to something important about the future of our platform.
IceHockeyMan intends to expand its editorial coverage to include Russian hockey and the KHL.
We believe that hockey supporters deserve access to accurate information and meaningful analysis about the sport, regardless of where the games are played.
This will be an independent editorial decision by IceHockeyMan, not a claim that the CAS ruling has changed media laws or broadcasting rights.
Our ambition is to build coverage that helps readers understand Russian hockey in the same way we approach other leagues.
That means going beyond simple match results.
We want to examine the hockey itself.
What Russian Hockey Coverage Will Include
- KHL News: Important developments involving clubs, coaches, players, management and league competition.
- Russian Hockey Players: Player performances, career development, significant achievements and verified transfers.
- Coaching and Tactical Analysis: Playing systems, defensive structures, offensive approaches, special teams and coaching decisions.
- Young Talent: Emerging players, junior development, prospects and the pathway towards professional hockey.
- Russian Players Abroad: The performances and development of Russian players competing in the NHL and European leagues.
- International Hockey: Russia’s national-team preparations, eligibility developments and participation in international tournaments.
We will approach those subjects through the same editorial principles that guide our coverage elsewhere.
Facts must be verified.
Rumours must be identified as rumours.
Analysis must be separated from confirmed information.
And our reporting must remain independent of political interests.
We will not publish political propaganda disguised as hockey news.
We will not treat a hockey achievement as evidence that a country’s political decisions are correct.
Nor will we ignore legitimate sporting developments simply because they involve Russian athletes or clubs.
Our position is simple: we cover hockey because it is hockey.
That is the standard I want IceHockeyMan to represent.
Russian Hockey Is Bigger Than One League
When people hear the words Russian hockey, many immediately think about the KHL.
And naturally, the KHL is an important part of the country’s professional hockey structure.
But Russian hockey is much broader than one competition.
It includes junior development programmes, regional clubs, coaching schools, youth academies and a long tradition of producing technically gifted players.
For someone interested in coaching, there is a great deal worth studying.
Russian hockey has historically placed significant emphasis on puck skills, combination play, offensive creativity and technical development.
Of course, modern Russian teams do not all play the same way.
Individual coaches have different philosophies, and the tactical identity of each club depends on its players and circumstances.
That is precisely why proper analysis matters.
We should not reduce an entire hockey nation to a stereotype.
We should examine what teams actually do.
How do they build attacks?
How do they defend the neutral zone?
How do their power-play units create passing lanes?
How do coaches develop younger players and manage experienced professionals?
What can other leagues learn from successful approaches?
Those are meaningful hockey questions.
And they are questions worth answering, regardless of where a team is located.
As a Finnish Coach, I Know What Rivalry Means
Finland and Russia have a long and significant history of international hockey competition.
For Finnish hockey supporters, these games have often carried enormous sporting importance.
They have involved emotion, pressure and fierce competition.
And they have produced some unforgettable moments.
But I have always believed that a great sporting rivalry should be built on respect for the opponent’s ability.
You do not need to dislike an entire nation to want your national team to beat its hockey team.
You do not need to agree with a country’s politics to appreciate the skill of its players.
And you do not need to abandon your own identity to recognise the achievements of another hockey programme.
In fact, one of the reasons international hockey is so fascinating is that different countries have developed different approaches to the game.
Finnish hockey has built a strong reputation around structure, discipline, collective responsibility and tactical organisation.
Russian hockey has its own traditions and strengths.
When those approaches meet, the result can be an outstanding tactical contest.
As a coach, I would rather study those differences than pretend one side has nothing to contribute.
Respecting an opponent does not weaken your own team. It helps you understand how to beat them.
That is an important principle in coaching.
And I believe it is an equally important principle in international sport.
Russia Still Has to Earn Everything on the Ice
There is another point I want to emphasise.
Welcoming Russia’s potential return does not mean assuming that Russia deserves a medal.
It does not mean that historical achievements should determine future results.
And it certainly does not mean another national team should automatically lose a place it has already earned.
The 2027 Men’s World Championship has an established qualification structure, and the IIHF must now determine how to implement the CAS ruling.
The position of existing participants, including Ukraine, deserves proper consideration.
No team should be casually removed from a championship after earning its place through the sporting system.
That would contradict the same principle of fairness that makes this debate important.
If Russia returns, it must compete under clear and consistently applied rules.
It must prepare its team.
It must develop chemistry.
It must perform against opponents who have continued gaining international experience during its absence.
And it must earn its results on the ice.
That is how sporting competition should work.
A country’s hockey history deserves respect, but it does not score goals in tomorrow’s game.
That is something every coach understands.
What I Would Like to See From the IIHF
The CAS decision has changed the legal situation, but several practical questions remain unresolved.
In its official response on 30 October, the IIHF acknowledged the authority of CAS while expressing continuing concerns about safety and tournament organisation.
Those concerns deserve attention, but the process of resolving them should be transparent.
Personally, I would like to see a solution based on several clear principles.
First, player safety must be protected.
Every athlete, coach, official and spectator should be able to participate in international hockey without intimidation or unnecessary risk.
Second, existing qualification achievements must be respected.
National teams that have earned their championship places deserve fair treatment.
Third, participation rules must be consistent and clearly explained.
Players and federations need to understand the requirements and how those requirements are applied.
Fourth, political disagreement should not automatically replace sporting assessment.
Whenever participation restrictions are considered, decisions should be supported by appropriate evidence and made according to established regulations.
Finally, hockey must remain the central purpose of the competition.
International tournaments should provide an environment where sporting excellence, fair play and respect can exist together.
None of these principles eliminates the difficulties surrounding Russia’s potential return.
But they provide a framework for addressing those difficulties responsibly.
To the Fans Who Disagree With Me
I know that not everyone reading this article will share my opinion.
Some supporters will welcome Russia’s return.
Others will feel that the current restrictions should continue.
Some may agree with the sporting argument but remain deeply uncomfortable with the circumstances surrounding the decision.
I understand that.
I am not asking anyone to abandon their principles or forget what has happened.
I am asking that we keep the discussion honest and respectful.
Disagreement is not a problem.
Hockey supporters disagree about almost everything.
We disagree about tactics, coaching decisions, player selections, refereeing and which teams deserve to win.
Those disagreements are part of the culture of the game.
But when discussion turns to international conflicts, we should remember that there are real people behind the national flags.
We can argue about participation rules without attacking individual athletes.
We can discuss Russia’s hockey traditions without endorsing the war.
We can recognise the suffering of Ukrainian people without dismissing every Russian hockey player as an individual.
And we can disagree with one another without losing our respect for the sport.
That is the kind of discussion I want to encourage at IceHockeyMan.
My Message to Russian Hockey Players
To the young Russian players who may finally receive the opportunity to compete internationally, I would say something simple.
Make the opportunity count.
Do not take it for granted.
Represent your team with discipline, professionalism and respect.
Let your skating, your decisions and your performances speak for you.
Understand that some opponents may have strong feelings about your participation.
You cannot control every reaction.
But you can control your own behaviour.
Respect your opponents, respect the officials and recognise the responsibility that comes with wearing a national-team jersey.
The best way to demonstrate your value as a hockey player is through the quality of your game and the way you conduct yourself.
Make people remember your hockey.
That is the message I would give any young athlete representing any country.
My Final Verdict: Let Hockey Be Hockey
So, after considering the CAS ruling, the international reaction and the possible consequences for the World Championship, where do I stand?
My position is clear.
I welcome the possibility of Russia returning to international hockey because I believe sporting competition is stronger when talented athletes have a fair opportunity to participate.
I also believe that politics should not automatically determine how we judge individual hockey players.
But I do not believe sporting decisions should ignore genuine security concerns, the suffering caused by war or the rights of teams that have already qualified.
These responsibilities must exist together.
That is not always easy.
Sometimes sport operates in circumstances where there is no simple solution.
But I would rather see governing bodies work towards fair, transparent and practical solutions than abandon the principle that hockey can bring people together.
As for IceHockeyMan, I am pleased that we intend to broaden our coverage of Russian hockey.
We will approach the KHL and Russian hockey development with the same independence, curiosity and sporting standards that we apply to other leagues.
Our readers should be able to learn about a promising Russian defenceman, a Finnish coach, a Canadian goaltender or a Swedish junior prospect without the quality of our reporting changing because of nationality.
That is the kind of hockey platform I want to help build.
One where knowledge matters.
Where coaching insight matters.
Where facts matter.
And where supporters from different countries can share their passion for the same game.
We do not have to agree about politics to understand a great hockey play.
We do not have to support the same national team to recognise an outstanding performance.
And we do not have to share the same opinions to enjoy a sport that has brought millions of people together.
That is the power of hockey.
It is why I care about this game.
And it is why I believe its future should be built around players, coaches, supporters, fair competition and respect.
Hockey has no nationality when it comes to passion, dedication and the pursuit of excellence.
Let the players play. Let the coaches coach. Let the fans enjoy the game.
And let hockey be hockey.
Coach Mark Lehtonen
IceHockeyMan Hockey Analysis
Join the Discussion: What Do You Think?
Russia’s potential return to the World Championship has created a major debate across international hockey.
At IceHockeyMan, we welcome respectful discussion and different perspectives.
We would like to hear your thoughts:
- Do you agree with Coach Mark that politics should have a more limited role in determining international hockey participation?
- Do you support Russia’s return to the IIHF World Championships, or do you believe the restrictions should remain?
- Should IceHockeyMan expand its coverage of the KHL and Russian hockey?
- Which Russian hockey teams, players or developments would you like us to analyse?
- How should the IIHF protect both sporting fairness and participant safety?
For a detailed breakdown of the ruling, international reactions and its consequences for the 2027 World Championships, read our full IceHockeyMan report on Russia’s return to international hockey.
Share your opinion in the comments below. Different views are welcome, but respect for other supporters is essential.
IceHockeyMan – One Game. A World of Hockey.