IHM NHL DAILY RECAP | February 3, 2026
NHL Daily Recap
By IceHockeyMan Newsroom | February 3, 2026
IHM Academy - Performance Metrics Master.
Final Scores
Florida Panthers 3, Buffalo Sabres 5
Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Ottawa Senators 3
Washington Capitals 4, New York Islanders 1
Minnesota Wild 4, Montreal Canadiens 3 (OT)
Nashville Predators 6, St. Louis Blues 5
Chicago Blackhawks 6, San Jose Sharks 3
Dallas Stars 4, Winnipeg Jets 3 (OT)
Colorado Avalanche 0, Detroit Red Wings 2
Utah Mammoth 6, Vancouver Canucks 2
Calgary Flames 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 4
Game-by-Game Breakdown
Florida Panthers 3, Buffalo Sabres 5
Buffalo made their chances count with elite finishing, turning a lower shot volume into five goals. Florida carried the shot count, but the Sabres owned the conversion.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Florida 41, Buffalo 20
- Shots off target: Florida 18, Buffalo 15
- Shooting %: Florida 7.32% (3/41), Buffalo 25% (5/20)
- Blocked shots: Florida 20, Buffalo 13
- Goalkeeper Saves: Florida 15, Buffalo 38
- Saves %: Florida 75% (15/20), Buffalo 92.68% (38/41)
- Penalties: Florida 3, Buffalo 4
- PIM: Florida 6, Buffalo 8
Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Ottawa Senators 3
Ottawa controlled the shot share and forced Pittsburgh to defend long stretches. The Penguins were efficient early, but the Senators kept pushing until the edge showed on the scoreboard.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Pittsburgh 16, Ottawa 31
- Shots off target: Pittsburgh 10, Ottawa 18
- Shooting %: Pittsburgh 12.5% (2/16), Ottawa 9.68% (3/31)
- Blocked shots: Pittsburgh 9, Ottawa 17
- Goalkeeper Saves: Pittsburgh 28, Ottawa 14
- Saves %: Pittsburgh 90.32% (28/31), Ottawa 87.5% (14/16)
- Penalties: Pittsburgh 5, Ottawa 1
- PIM: Pittsburgh 10, Ottawa 2
Washington Capitals 4, New York Islanders 1
Washington finished at a high rate and turned their opportunities into separation. The Islanders generated volume, but could not solve the goaltending often enough.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Washington 24, NY Islanders 30
- Shots off target: Washington 11, NY Islanders 20
- Shooting %: Washington 16.67% (4/24), NY Islanders 3.33% (1/30)
- Blocked shots: Washington 12, NY Islanders 23
- Goalkeeper Saves: Washington 29, NY Islanders 20
- Saves %: Washington 96.67% (29/30), NY Islanders 86.96% (20/23)
- Penalties: Washington 3, NY Islanders 5
- PIM: Washington 9, NY Islanders 13
Minnesota Wild 4, Montreal Canadiens 3 (OT)
A tight game that stayed within one goal most of the night, then swung in overtime. Minnesota held the finishing edge and closed it out after regulation.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Minnesota 24, Montreal 20
- Shots off target: Minnesota 26, Montreal 9
- Shooting %: Minnesota 16.67% (4/24), Montreal 15% (3/20)
- Blocked shots: Minnesota 13, Montreal 15
- Goalkeeper Saves: Minnesota 17, Montreal 20
- Saves %: Minnesota 85% (17/20), Montreal 83.33% (20/24)
- Penalties: Minnesota 1, Montreal 3
- PIM: Minnesota 2, Montreal 6
Nashville Predators 6, St. Louis Blues 5
Pure track meet. Nashville converted at a higher rate and survived the back-and-forth swings. St. Louis had volume, but Nashville’s finishing kept them in front.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Nashville 28, St. Louis 34
- Shots off target: Nashville 21, St. Louis 12
- Shooting %: Nashville 21.43% (6/28), St. Louis 14.71% (5/34)
- Blocked shots: Nashville 10, St. Louis 11
- Goalkeeper Saves: Nashville 29, St. Louis 22
- Saves %: Nashville 85.29% (29/34), St. Louis 78.57% (22/28)
- Penalties: Nashville 2, St. Louis 2
- PIM: Nashville 4, St. Louis 4
Chicago Blackhawks 6, San Jose Sharks 3
Chicago’s finishing was the story, converting at a massive rate on limited shots. San Jose generated more attempts on net, but the gap in execution decided it.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Chicago 17, San Jose 27
- Shots off target: Chicago 12, San Jose 16
- Shooting %: Chicago 35.29% (6/17), San Jose 11.11% (3/27)
- Blocked shots: Chicago 6, San Jose 9
- Goalkeeper Saves: Chicago 24, San Jose 11
- Saves %: Chicago 88.89% (24/27), San Jose 64.71% (11/17)
- Penalties: Chicago 4, San Jose 4
- PIM: Chicago 8, San Jose 8
Dallas Stars 4, Winnipeg Jets 3 (OT)
Dallas and Winnipeg traded chances, then Dallas took it in overtime. The Stars held the shot edge and got enough saves to extend and finish.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Dallas 28, Winnipeg 27
- Shots off target: Dallas 22, Winnipeg 10
- Shooting %: Dallas 14.29% (4/28), Winnipeg 11.11% (3/27)
- Blocked shots: Dallas 7, Winnipeg 19
- Goalkeeper Saves: Dallas 24, Winnipeg 24
- Saves %: Dallas 88.89% (24/27), Winnipeg 85.71% (24/28)
- Penalties: Dallas 3, Winnipeg 4
- PIM: Dallas 6, Winnipeg 8
Colorado Avalanche 0, Detroit Red Wings 2
Detroit got the only goals of the night and protected the middle. Colorado put pucks on net, but the Red Wings’ goaltending and structure held firm.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Colorado 21, Detroit 25
- Shots off target: Colorado 16, Detroit 17
- Shooting %: Colorado 0% (0/21), Detroit 8% (2/25)
- Blocked shots: Colorado 17, Detroit 15
- Goalkeeper Saves: Colorado 23, Detroit 21
- Saves %: Colorado 95.83% (23/24), Detroit 100% (21/21)
- Penalties: Colorado 3, Detroit 2
- PIM: Colorado 14, Detroit 4
Utah Mammoth 6, Vancouver Canucks 2
Utah’s finishing was ruthless, turning 20 shots into six goals. Vancouver had a slight shot edge but could not match the efficiency swing.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Utah 20, Vancouver 23
- Shots off target: Utah 14, Vancouver 12
- Shooting %: Utah 30% (6/20), Vancouver 8.7% (2/23)
- Blocked shots: Utah 10, Vancouver 9
- Goalkeeper Saves: Utah 21, Vancouver 14
- Saves %: Utah 91.3% (21/23), Vancouver 70% (14/20)
- Penalties: Utah 5, Vancouver 3
- PIM: Utah 18, Vancouver 14
Calgary Flames 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 4
Toronto handled the finishing battle and got the saves when Calgary tried to push. Calgary owned blocks, but Toronto’s conversion rate separated them.
Stats
- Shots on Goal: Calgary 30, Toronto 22
- Shots off target: Calgary 13, Toronto 13
- Shooting %: Calgary 6.67% (2/30), Toronto 18.18% (4/22)
- Blocked shots: Calgary 27, Toronto 17
- Goalkeeper Saves: Calgary 18, Toronto 28
- Saves %: Calgary 85.71% (18/21), Toronto 93.33% (28/30)
- Penalties: Calgary 1, Toronto 2
- PIM: Calgary 2, Toronto 4
Coach Mark Comment
Today was a clean example of how results split into two buckets: volume teams and efficiency teams. Buffalo and Utah were efficiency teams, and the shooting percentages tell the whole story. When a team is converting above 20% at five-on-five pace, you are not losing because of effort, you are losing because of finish and goaltending layers. Florida and Vancouver did not look short on attempts, but they were chasing save quality and slot coverage. On the other side, Detroit showed a classic shutdown win, low drama, disciplined structure, and a goaltending performance that erased the opponent’s shooting lanes.
The overtime games are the reminder that process still matters: Dallas and Minnesota stayed stable enough to let a single bounce decide it, while Nashville and St. Louis turned into a chaos game where every defensive detail got punished. If you want one practical takeaway before the Olympic break, it is this: teams that protect the house and keep their goaltender clean travel better than teams that only rely on trading chances.
Q&A
Why can a team outshoot the opponent and still lose by multiple goals?
Shot volume does not equal shot quality. If the losing team is taking low-danger shots from the outside while the opponent finishes from high-danger areas, the shooting percentage gap can decide the game quickly.
What does Shooting % really tell you in a single game?
It is a snapshot of finishing and chance quality. Extreme values often regress over time, but on a single night it can explain why the scoreboard does not match the shot count.
Why do blocked shots matter in a recap?
Blocks show defensive commitment and lane control. A high block total can mean a team protected the middle, but it can also mean they spent too much time defending.
What is the quickest way to interpret goalie performance from the stat screen?
Start with Saves % and then compare Goals Allowed versus Shots on Goal. A goalie can face high volume and still be excellent if the save rate stays strong under pressure.
How should I read PIM and penalties without play-by-play context?
Treat it as discipline and game flow. A team taking more penalties often spends more time defending, but you still need the score context to know if it was costly.