Seattle Kraken 4-1 San Jose Sharks: Schwartz leads special-teams clinic | IHM News IHM

Seattle Kraken 4-1 San Jose Sharks: Schwartz leads special-teams clinic | IHM News IHM

Seattle Kraken 4-1 San Jose Sharks: Schwartz drives special-teams statement at home

Date: November 16, 2025 – Author: IHM News

Seattle opened the weekend with a composed 4-1 win against the San Jose Sharks at Climate Pledge Arena, leaning on five-on-five structure and sharp special teams rather than raw shot volume. The Kraken were outshot 26-24 but controlled the game once they settled after a busy first period, turning a 1-1 scoreline into a two-goal cushion in the second and closing the night with a shorthanded empty-net dagger.

Jaden Schwartz finished with two goals, including the late shorthanded empty-netter that sealed it at 4-1. Eeli Tolvanen and Adam Larsson supplied the other Seattle tallies, while Chandler Stephenson and Jamie Oleksiak combined for four assists out of the top six. On the other side, the Sharks generated plenty of perimeter looks but only broke through on an early power-play marker from Alexander Wennberg.

First period: trading punches and a late goalie change

Seattle struck first at 8:14 of the opening frame when Schwartz jumped into space off the rush and finished a clean feed from Stephenson, with Oleksiak providing the secondary assist for a 1-0 lead. San Jose answered late in the period on the power play: after a hooking minor against Ryan Lindgren, Wennberg tied it 1-1 at 19:42, wiring a one-timer from the right side off passes by celebrated rookie Macklin Celebrini and William Eklund.

The goal came at the end of a heavy Sharks push and triggered a change in the Seattle crease, with Philipp Grubauer coming in to relieve starter Matt Murray for the rest of the night. From there, the Kraken tightened their puck management through the neutral zone and stopped feeding San Jose transition looks.

Second period: blue-line punch swings control to Seattle

The middle frame belonged to the Kraken defense. After killing off early penalties to Tolvanen and Vince Dunn, Seattle flipped the momentum at 16:05 when Larsson jumped down from the blue line and buried a cross-slot pass from Mason Marchment, with Matty Beniers picking up the second assist for a 2-1 advantage.

Less than a minute and a half later, the same cycle pressure broke the Sharks again. Tolvanen found soft ice in the left circle and snapped home Seattle’s third of the night at 16:43, finishing another clean passing sequence from Stephenson and Oleksiak to push the lead to 3-1. San Jose struggled to clear the zone under pressure, spending long stretches defending layered point shots and net-front tips rather than attacking off the rush.

Third period: disciplined kill and shorthanded knockout

The Sharks tried to climb back in the third, earning multiple power plays as the Kraken took a string of minor penalties, including delays of game and tripping calls. Seattle’s penalty kill stayed compact in the middle, forcing San Jose to the outside and allowing Grubauer to handle the long looks cleanly.

With time running out and the Sharks pressing with the goalie pulled on a late advantage, the Kraken delivered the final blow. Lindgren read a loose puck, transitioned quickly through the neutral zone and found Schwartz in stride; the winger finished into the empty cage shorthanded at 16:31 for his second of the night and the 4-1 final.

Key numbers | IHM Performance Metrics

  • Shots on goal: Seattle 24, San Jose 26
  • Shooting percentage: Seattle 16.67% (4/24), San Jose 3.85% (1/26)
  • Goalie saves: Kraken goalies combined 25/26 (96.15% SV%), Sharks 20/23 (86.96% SV%), fourth goal allowed empty net
  • Blocked shots: Seattle 8, San Jose 25
  • Penalties / PIM: Seattle 6 minors for 12 PIM, San Jose 2 minors for 4 PIM
  • Special teams snapshot: Kraken penalty kill perfect on the night, Sharks convert once on the power play

Team notes and standout performers

For Seattle, Schwartz’s two-goal performance was backed up by a quietly dominant night from the Stephenson line; the center finished with two primary assists and drove a steady forecheck that wore down San Jose’s top pair. Tolvanen’s release was again a difference-maker from the left flank, while Larsson’s timing on his pinches kept the Sharks guessing on point pressure.

On the Sharks side, Wennberg’s power-play strike and Celebrini’s poise on the puck were positives, and the shot edge shows San Jose was not out of the game territorially. But with only one goal on 26 shots and heavy reliance on blocked attempts, the visitors lacked interior presence and second-chance pressure in front of the Seattle net.

Coach Mark comment

From a coaching perspective, this game is a clinic in staying patient when the shot clock is not in your favour. Seattle trusted their defensive layers, kept the middle of the ice protected and punished mistakes when the Sharks overextended. If the Kraken repeat this kind of special-teams discipline and structured breakout under pressure, they will stay in the Pacific Division conversation all season.

Questions & Answers | IHM Performance Metrics

Q: How did Seattle win despite being outshot?
A: The Kraken limited high-danger looks, protected the slot and finished at a far better clip, converting four of 24 shots while holding San Jose to one goal on 26 attempts.

Q: What was the turning point of the game?
A: The late second-period stretch where Larsson and Tolvanen scored less than two minutes apart. That spell flipped a 1-1 game into a 3-1 cushion and forced the Sharks to chase in the third.

Q: How important was special-teams play in this matchup?
A: Very important. San Jose’s lone goal came on the power play, but Seattle’s penalty kill tightened as the game went on and then added a shorthanded empty-netter to close it out.

Q: Did the goalie change affect Seattle’s stability?
A: If anything it calmed the group. Grubauer stepped in and, together with Murray’s early work, the Kraken goalies combined for 25 saves on 26 shots, giving the skaters confidence to keep playing their structure.

Q: What does this result mean for both teams going forward?
A: For Seattle, it reinforces a blueprint built on structure, depth scoring and special-teams detail. For San Jose, the takeaway is clear: more net-front traffic and fewer perimeter cycles if they want their shot volume to translate into goals.

More NHL coverage on IHM

For more nightly recaps, performance metrics and long-form features from across the League, visit IceHockeyMan - IHM News.